These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9090147)

  • 1. Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.
    Philbeck JW; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 9090147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent.
    Kudoh N
    Perception; 2005; 34(11):1399-416. PubMed ID: 16355744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments.
    Creem-Regehr SH; Willemsen P; Gooch AA; Thompson WB
    Perception; 2005; 34(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 15832569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation.
    Fukusima SS; Loomis JM; Da Silva JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 9090148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of motion parallax and perspective cues on perceived size and distance.
    Tozawa J; Oyama T
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1007-23. PubMed ID: 17076062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing beyond the target: environmental context affects distance perception.
    Witt JK; Stefanucci JK; Riener CR; Proffitt DR
    Perception; 2007; 36(12):1752-68. PubMed ID: 18283926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oculomotor contribution to the change in perceived speed with viewing distance.
    Geri GA; Pierce BJ; Patterson R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Nov; 25(11):2851-7. PubMed ID: 18978866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.
    Ellard CG; Shaughnessy SC
    Perception; 2003; 32(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 12854643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of top-down knowledge about environmental context in egocentric distance judgments.
    Philbeck JW; Gajewski DA; Jaidzeka SM; Wallin CP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):586-599. PubMed ID: 29204865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action.
    Loomis JM; Klatzky RL; Philbeck JW; Golledge RG
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Aug; 60(6):966-80. PubMed ID: 9718956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance.
    Foley JM
    Perception; 1977; 6(4):449-60. PubMed ID: 917733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis.
    Andre J; Rogers S
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16900829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ontological issues in distance perception: cue use under full cue conditions cannot be inferred from use under controlled conditions.
    Mon-Williams M; Bingham GP
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 18459266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance impairs postural stability only under binocular viewing.
    Lê TT; Kapoula Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3586-93. PubMed ID: 16899270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative distance cues contribute to scaling depth from motion parallax.
    Ohtsuka S; Ujike H; Saida S
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Apr; 64(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 12049281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.
    Philbeck JW; Loomis JM; Beall AC
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):601-12. PubMed ID: 9158334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.