160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9091261)
1. An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs.
Tudor GR; Finlay D; Taub N
Clin Radiol; 1997 Mar; 52(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 9091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there an improvement in performance when radiographs are re-reported at 24 hours?
Tudor GR; Finlay DB
Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):465-8. PubMed ID: 10505011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs.
Robinson PJ; Wilson D; Coral A; Murphy A; Verow P
Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):323-30. PubMed ID: 10474490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between expert thoracic radiologists and the chest radiograph reports provided by consultant radiologists and reporting radiographers in clinical practice: Review of a single clinical site.
Woznitza N; Piper K; Burke S; Ellis S; Bothamley G
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Aug; 24(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 29976336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs.
Sandau N; Brorson S; Olsen BS; Sørensen AK; Jensen SL; Schantz K; Ovesen J; Rasmussen JV
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 13(1):299. PubMed ID: 30482217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of hip radiographs in primary care: the inter-observer agreement of reporting native hip pathology.
Kenyon PJ; Perry D; Barrett M; Carroll FA; Thomas G
Hip Int; 2014; 24(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 24500827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children.
Leech SC; McHugh K; Sullivan PB
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Apr; 29(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10199902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the comparative agreement between chest radiographs and CT scans in intensive care units.
Brooks D; Wright SE; Beattie A; McAllister N; Anderson NH; Roy AI; Gonsalves P; Yates B; Graziadio S; Mackie A; Davidson J; Gopal SV; Whittle R; Zahed A; Barton L; Elameer M; Tuckett J; Holmes R; Sutcliffe A; Santamaria N; de Lalouviere LH; Gupta S; Subramaniam J; Pearson JA; Brandwood M; Burnham R; Rostron AJ; Simpson AJ
J Crit Care; 2024 Aug; 82():154760. PubMed ID: 38492522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of post-operative interference gap assessment on plain radiographs after cementless primary THA.
Belt M; Gliese B; Muharemovic O; Malchau H; Husted H; Troelsen A; Gromov K
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():103-107. PubMed ID: 30612032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concordance between a gastrointestinal consultant radiologist, a consultant radiologist and qualified reporting radiographers interpreting abdominal radiographs.
Moth A; Benning J; Glover J; Brown V; Pittock L; Woznitza N; Piper K
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Mar; 29(2):408-415. PubMed ID: 36791613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the assessment of atelectasis and consolidation in neonatal chest radiographs.
Bloomfield FH; Teele RL; Voss M; Knight DB; Harding JE
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Jun; 29(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 10369906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic assessment of constipation on plain abdominal radiographs in children.
van den Bosch M; Graafmans D; Nievelstein R; Beek E
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Mar; 36(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 16418835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Error review: can this improve reporting performance?
Tudor GR; Finlay DB
Clin Radiol; 2001 Sep; 56(9):751-4. PubMed ID: 11585397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement in the reporting of General Practitioner requested musculoskeletal radiographs: Reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist.
Cain G; Pittock LJ; Piper K; Venumbaka MR; Bodoceanu M
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):288-295. PubMed ID: 35000869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and inter-examiner agreement when assessing radiographic implant bone levels: Differences related to brightness, accuracy, participant demographics and implant characteristics.
Walton TR; Layton DM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):756-771. PubMed ID: 30240063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.
Brealey S; Scally A; Hahn S; Thomas N; Godfrey C; Coomarasamy A
Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15664578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trans-Atlantic hospital agreement in reading first day radiographs of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures.
Poolman RW; Hanel DP; Mann FA; Ponsen KJ; Marti RK; Roolker L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Sep; 122(7):373-8. PubMed ID: 12228796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of radiographers' plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice.
Brealey S; Hewitt C; Scally A; Hahn S; Godfrey C; Thomas N
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 82(979):600-4. PubMed ID: 19153189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. WhatsApp Messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: inter- and intra-observer agreement study.
Giordano V; Koch HA; Mendes CH; Bergamin A; de Souza FS; do Amaral NP
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Feb; 84(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25468642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
