BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9092222)

  • 1. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
    Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Contrast-enhanced intracranial 3 D MR angiography (CE-MRA) in assessing arterial stenoses and aneurysms].
    Gottschalk S; Gaebel C; Haendler G; Gellissen J; Missler U; Seidel G; Nowak G; Petersen D
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):704-13. PubMed ID: 12063599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
    Lin J; Li D; Yan F
    Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
    Catalano C; Laghi A; Pediconi F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries].
    Carriero A; Gatta S; Baratto M; Marano R; Aulisa R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9638159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Contrast enhanced MR-angiography (CE-MRA): do contrast media with higher T1 relaxation improve imaging of carotid stenoses?].
    Friese S; Krapf H; Fetter M; Vonthein R; Skalej M; Küker W
    Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 11471296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Magnetic resonance angiographic occlusion of the cervical carotid artery at 3 tesla: its pitfalls].
    Mano Y; Shimizu H; Inoue T; Tominaga T
    No Shinkei Geka; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 18232321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
    U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
    Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.