These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. US court tests the breadth of patent protection on proteins. Wadman M Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6778):532. PubMed ID: 10766203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Roche's Taq patent 'obtained by deceit', rules US court. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):709. PubMed ID: 10617182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Opinions evolve on Kauffman patent. Dove A Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):373. PubMed ID: 10748506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law. Bagley MA William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patent prosecution of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents in a changing legal landscape. Lu DL; Kowalski TJ; Jarecki-Black J Future Med Chem; 2010 Jan; 2(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 21426040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotechnology inventions in the health care environment: what to patent and how to avoid defeat. Murashige KR Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1995 Dec; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10158648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Process patent bill on track. Gershon D Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6435):274. PubMed ID: 8332176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new section 103(b) of the patent law: an obvious solution? Van Horn CE; Barlow SA Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Jun; 14(6):773-4. PubMed ID: 9630989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotechnology patenting policy in the European Union--as exemplified by the development in Germany. Schrell A; Bauser H; Brunner H Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():13-39. PubMed ID: 17522818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Have you bargained away patent rights? Inventors and entrepreneurs need to consider a recent Supreme Court ruling in their patent strategies. Baggot B Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):297-8. PubMed ID: 10096300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Monsters at the patent office: the inconsistent conclusions of moral utility and the controversy of human cloning. Smith AR De Paul Law Rev; 2003; 53(1):159-203. PubMed ID: 15568254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]