These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9094115)

  • 1. Biotech food labeling: polite hedging or loggerheads?
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Apr; 15(4):308. PubMed ID: 9094115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Europe and US in confrontation over GM food labelling criteria.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):641. PubMed ID: 10227274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
    Formanek R
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotechnology and the food label: a legal perspective.
    Degnan FH
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 11824462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GM foods debate needs a recipe for restoring trust.
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):639. PubMed ID: 10227273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Food foments European disunity.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1317. PubMed ID: 9415868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science-free GM good tests advance.
    Peerenboom E
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 9702761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are bioengineered foods safe?. Interview by Larry Thompson.
    Henney JE
    FDA Consum; 2000; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10732496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caution: may be harmless if swallowed.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US and biologists wary of strict biotech rules.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):6. PubMed ID: 14999250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FDA not yet moved by biotech food critics.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 10625375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Euro indecision triggers food anarchy.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1331. PubMed ID: 9415875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Food fight. The battle heats up between the U.S. and Europe over genetically engineered crops.
    Kluger J
    Time; 1999 Sep; 154(11):42-4. PubMed ID: 10620918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No "killer tomatoes": easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants.
    Beach JE
    Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11795332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the GM industry writes its own rules.
    Bereano PL
    Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6788):733. PubMed ID: 10866176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uninformation and the choice paradox.
    McHughen A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 18(10):1018-9. PubMed ID: 11016993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.