These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9094913)

  • 1. Insights into dietary recall from a longitudinal study: accuracy over four decades.
    Dwyer JT; Coleman KA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1153S-1158S. PubMed ID: 9094913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memory of food intake in the distant past.
    Dwyer JT; Gardner J; Halvorsen K; Krall EA; Cohen A; Valadian I
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Nov; 130(5):1033-46. PubMed ID: 2816890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Errors in reported dietary intakes. II. Long-term recall.
    Wu ML; Whittemore AS; Jung DL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Nov; 128(5):1137-45. PubMed ID: 3189287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of self-reported dietary intake at school meals by American Indian children: the Pathways Study.
    Weber JL; Lytle L; Gittelsohn J; Cunningham-Sabo L; Heller K; Anliker JA; Stevens J; Hurley J; Ring K
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 May; 104(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 15127059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Validation Study of the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall for Children, 2014 Version, at School Lunch.
    Krehbiel CF; DuPaul GJ; Hoffman JA
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 May; 117(5):715-724. PubMed ID: 28017317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.
    Conway JM; Ingwersen LA; Moshfegh AJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 15054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall.
    Karvetti RL; Knuts LR
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Nov; 85(11):1437-42. PubMed ID: 4056262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative validity of the repeated 24 h recall for estimating energy and selected nutrient intakes of rural Ghanaian children.
    Ferguson EL; Gibson RS; Opare-Obisaw C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Apr; 48(4):241-52. PubMed ID: 8039484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of ten-year dietary recall: implications for cancer research.
    Ambrosini GL; van Roosbroeck SA; Mackerras D; Fritschi L; de Klerk NH; Musk AW
    J Nutr; 2003 Aug; 133(8):2663-8. PubMed ID: 12888655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of dietary history from the distant past.
    Byers T; Marshall J; Anthony E; Fiedler R; Zielezny M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Jun; 125(6):999-1011. PubMed ID: 3578258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of eight-year diet recall in cancer cases and controls.
    Lindsted KD; Kuzma JW
    Epidemiology; 1990 Sep; 1(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 2078616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 24-h recall does not provide a valid estimate of absolute nutrient intakes for rural women in southern Ethiopia.
    Alemayehu AA; Abebe Y; Gibson RS
    Nutrition; 2011 Sep; 27(9):919-24. PubMed ID: 21295444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of retrospective information on diet 20 years ago and consistency of independent measurements of remote adolescent diet.
    Wolk A; Bergström R; Hansson LE; Nyrén O
    Nutr Cancer; 1997; 29(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 9457745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparability of dietary patterns assessed by multiple dietary assessment methods: results from the 1946 British Birth Cohort.
    McNaughton SA; Mishra GD; Bramwell G; Paul AA; Wadsworth ME
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Mar; 59(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 15523484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 24-hour recall for Senegalese weanlings: a validation exercise.
    Dop MC; Milan C; Milan C; N'Diaye AM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Sep; 48(9):643-53. PubMed ID: 8001521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment.
    Bingham SA; Day NE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a dietary targets monitor.
    Lean ME; Anderson AS; Morrison C; Currall J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 May; 57(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 12771967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of recalled food intake in the past in a Japanese population.
    Takatsuka N; Kawakami N; Kawai K; Okamoto Y; Ishiwata K; Shimizu H
    J Epidemiol; 1996 Mar; 6(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 8795952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using encoding and retrieval strategies to improve 24-hour dietary recalls among older adults.
    Ervin RB; Smiciklas-Wright H
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Sep; 98(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 9739798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 1: the fatal flaws of food frequency questionnaires and other memory-based dietary assessment methods.
    Archer E; Marlow ML; Lavie CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():113-124. PubMed ID: 30121379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.