These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9094933)

  • 21. A comparison of computer-assisted and hard copy telephone interviewing.
    Harlow BL; Rosenthal JF; Ziegler RG
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Aug; 122(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 4014216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of a protocol to assess dietary intake among Hispanics who have low literacy skills in English.
    Lyons GK; Woodruff SI; Candelaria JI; Rupp JW; Elder JP
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1996 Dec; 96(12):1276-9. PubMed ID: 8948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment.
    Lyu LC; Hankin JH; Liu LQ; Wilkens LR; Lee JH; Goodman MT; Kolonel LN
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9434650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing.
    Lessler JT; O'Reilly JM
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 167():366-82. PubMed ID: 9243570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality control in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Nutrition Modality.
    Tillotson JL; Gorder DD; DuChene AG; Grambsch PV; Wenz J
    Control Clin Trials; 1986 Sep; 7(3 Suppl):66S-90S. PubMed ID: 3802847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation.
    Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Nov; 4(4):e123. PubMed ID: 27815234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing.
    Williams ML; Freeman RC; Bowen AM; Zhao Z; Elwood WN; Gordon C; Young P; Rusek R; Signes CA
    AIDS Educ Prev; 2000 Jun; 12(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 10926124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity of self-reported age at menarche in computer-assisted interview among Chinese schoolgirls: a cross-sectional study.
    Mao Y; Lian Q; Zuo X; Zhang Y; Luo S; Zhang S; Tu X; Lou C; Zhou W
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016799. PubMed ID: 29362246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of electronic diet recording nutrient estimates compared to dietitian analysis of diet records: randomized controlled trial.
    Raatz SK; Scheett AJ; Johnson LK; Jahns L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e21. PubMed ID: 25604640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: a review.
    Fox TA; Heimendinger J; Block G
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1992 Jun; 92(6):729-32. PubMed ID: 1607571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence.
    Gemming L; Utter J; Ni Mhurchu C
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Jan; 115(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 25441955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodological considerations and future insights for 24-hour dietary recall assessment in children.
    Foster E; Bradley J
    Nutr Res; 2018 Mar; 51():1-11. PubMed ID: 29673539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying sources of measurement error in assessing dietary intakes - Results of a multi-country ring-trial.
    Gavrieli A; Trichopoulou A; Valsta LM; Ioannidou S; Berry R; Roe M; Harvey L; Finglas P; Glibetic M; Gurinovic M; Naska A
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Feb; 29(2):127-134. PubMed ID: 30642793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nutrition epidemiology: how do we know what they ate?
    Barrett-Connor E
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1991 Jul; 54(1 Suppl):182S-187S. PubMed ID: 2053559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inventory of experiences from national/regional dietary monitoring surveys using EPIC-Soft.
    Huybrechts I; Casagrande C; Nicolas G; Geelen A; Crispim SP; De Keyzer W; Freisling H; De Henauw S; De Maeyer M; Krems C; Amiano P; de Boer EJ; Ocké MC; de Vries JH; Slimani N;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S16-28. PubMed ID: 21731002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Dietary Variety Score: assessing diet quality in healthy young and older adults.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Driscoll A; Rolls BJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1997 Mar; 97(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 9060943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes.
    Newman JC; Des Jarlais DC; Turner CF; Gribble J; Cooley P; Paone D
    Am J Public Health; 2002 Feb; 92(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 11818309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A computerized diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies.
    Slattery ML; Caan BJ; Duncan D; Berry TD; Coates A; Kerber R
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Jul; 94(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 8021418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The multimedia computer for low-literacy patient education: a pilot project of cancer risk perceptions.
    Wofford JL; Currin D; Michielutte R; Wofford MM
    MedGenMed; 2001 Apr; 3(2):23. PubMed ID: 11549972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New mobile methods for dietary assessment: review of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods.
    Boushey CJ; Spoden M; Zhu FM; Delp EJ; Kerr DA
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2017 Aug; 76(3):283-294. PubMed ID: 27938425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.