These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9095010)
1. Measuring response intervals in a system with a 911 primary and an emergency medical services secondary public safety answering point. Campbell JP; Gridley TS; Muelleman RL Ann Emerg Med; 1997 Apr; 29(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 9095010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vehicle-at-scene-to-patient-access interval measured with computer-aided dispatch. Campbell JP; Gratton MC; Girkin JP; Watson WA Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Feb; 25(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 7832344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. System implications of the ambulance arrival-to-patient contact interval on response interval compliance. Campbell JP; Gratton MC; Salomone JA; Lindholm DJ; Watson WA Prehosp Disaster Med; 1994; 9(4):230-2; discussion 233. PubMed ID: 10155533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Secondary Public Safety Answering Points Delay the Response to out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Moeller BJ; Jameson AM; Elkes J; Lozano M Prehosp Emerg Care; 2024; 28(1):135-138. PubMed ID: 37195877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the number of request calls on the time from call to hospital arrival: a cross-sectional study of an ambulance record database in Nara prefecture, Japan. Hanaki N; Yamashita K; Kunisawa S; Imanaka Y BMJ Open; 2016 Dec; 6(12):e012194. PubMed ID: 27940625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The "vertical response time": barriers to ambulance response in an urban area. Silverman RA; Galea S; Blaney S; Freese J; Prezant DJ; Park R; Pahk R; Caron D; Yoon S; Epstein J; Richmond NJ Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 14(9):772-8. PubMed ID: 17601996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring the call-receipt-to-defibrillation interval: evaluation of prehospital methods. Campbell JP; Kroshus KS; Lindholm DJ; Watson WA Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Dec; 26(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 7492039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The emergency telephone number--the essential weak link in an emergency system. Prospective studies involving cardiac arrests observed by bystanders]. Diehl P; Mauer D; Schneider T; Dick W Anaesthesist; 1992 Jun; 41(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 1636920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Response Times for Suspected Stroke in the United States. Schwartz J; Dreyer RP; Murugiah K; Ranasinghe I Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 26953776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergency medical services response time and mortality in an urban setting. Blanchard IE; Doig CJ; Hagel BE; Anton AR; Zygun DA; Kortbeek JB; Powell DG; Williamson TS; Fick GH; Innes GD Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(1):142-51. PubMed ID: 22026820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The association between ambulance hospital turnaround times and patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day. Vandeventer S; Studnek JR; Garrett JS; Ward SR; Staley K; Blackwell T Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(3):366-70. PubMed ID: 21480775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid reorganization of the Milan metropolitan public safety answering point operations during the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Marrazzo F; Spina S; Pepe PE; D'Ambrosio A; Bernasconi F; Manzoni P; Graci C; Frigerio C; Sacchi M; Stucchi R; Teruzzi M; Baraldi S; Lovisari F; Langer T; Sforza A; Migliari M; Sechi G; Sangalli F; Fumagalli R; J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open; 2020 Dec; 1(6):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 33043317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the Implementation of an Advanced Life Support Quick Response Vehicle (QRV) in an Integrated Fire/EMS System Improve Patient Contact Response Time? Anderson DW; Dhindsa HS; Wan W; Salot D Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Aug; 30(4):382-4. PubMed ID: 25994810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring the EMS patient access time interval and the impact of responding to high-rise buildings. Morrison LJ; Angelini MP; Vermeulen MJ; Schwartz B Prehosp Emerg Care; 2005; 9(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 16036822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a citywide blackout on an urban emergency medical services system. Freese J; Richmond NJ; Silverman RA; Braun J; Kaufman BJ; Clair J Prehosp Disaster Med; 2006; 21(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 17334182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A national census of ambulance response times to emergency calls in Ireland. Breen N; Woods J; Bury G; Murphy AW; Brazier H J Accid Emerg Med; 2000 Nov; 17(6):392-5. PubMed ID: 11104237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduction of the call-response interval with ambulance base paging. Jermyn BD Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 11045410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emergency medical dispatch codes association with emergency department outcomes. Hettinger AZ; Cushman JT; Shah MN; Noyes K Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23140195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Ambulance Staffing Models in a Metropolitan, Fire-Based EMS System. Cortez EJ; Panchal AR; Davis JE; Keseg DP Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Apr; 32(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 28095934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergency medical service agency definitions of response intervals. Meislin HW; Conn JB; Conroy C; Tibbitts M Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 34(4 Pt 1):453-8. PubMed ID: 10499945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]