These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9097090)

  • 1. The effects of genotyping errors and interference on estimation of genetic distance.
    Goldstein DR; Zhao H; Speed TP
    Hum Hered; 1997; 47(2):86-100. PubMed ID: 9097090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.
    Thompson CL; Baechle D; Lu Q; Mathew G; Song Y; Iyengar SK; Gray-McGuire C; Goddard KA
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S153. PubMed ID: 16451614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of genotype error rate using samples with pedigree information--an application on the GeneChip Mapping 10K array.
    Hao K; Li C; Rosenow C; Hung Wong W
    Genomics; 2004 Oct; 84(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 15475239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of chi 2 models of recombination for exclusion mapping and gene ordering.
    Goldstein DR; Zhao H; Speed TP
    Genomics; 1995 May; 27(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 7557991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linkage information and bias in the presence of interference.
    Bishop DT; Thompson EA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 3402723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of ancestry probabilities in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Zhang H; Stern H
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Feb; 112(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 16307226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias in multipoint linkage analysis arising from map misspecification.
    Daw EW; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 19(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 11108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Haplotype analysis in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism data: double recombinants.
    Petronis A; Kennedy JL; Paterson AD
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S301-6. PubMed ID: 10597453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Gordon D; Finch SJ; Nothnagel M; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12446984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating interference into linkage analysis for experimental crosses.
    Armstrong NJ; McPeek MS; Speed TP
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):374-86. PubMed ID: 16354713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of genotyping error rate from repeat genotyping, unintentional recaptures and known parent-offspring comparisons in 16 microsatellite loci for brown rockfish (Sebastes auriculatus).
    Hess MA; Rhydderch JG; LeClair LL; Buckley RM; Kawase M; Hauser L
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1114-23. PubMed ID: 22958648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.
    Seaman SR; Holmans P
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15925894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics.
    Broquet T; Petit E
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Nov; 13(11):3601-8. PubMed ID: 15488016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating crossover interference into pedigree analysis using the chi 2 model.
    Lin S; Speed TP
    Hum Hered; 1996; 46(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 8956027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical and genetic map of 5q31: use of fluorescence in situ hybridization data to identify errors in the CEPH database. Centre d'Etude de Polymorphisme Humain.
    Westbrook CA; Le Beau MM; Neuman WL; Keinanen M; Yamaoka LH; Speer MC; Espinosa R; Nakamura Y; Williamson R; Mullan M
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1994; 67(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 7913678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The misuse of the three-point cross for estimating chiasma interference.
    Casares P
    Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Oct; 82(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 17992000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of Genotype Errors.
    O'Connell J; Yao Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():11-23. PubMed ID: 28980239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.