These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9097486)
1. A collaborative project in Connecticut to improve the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Vaccarino LV; Gottlieb LD; McGovern-Hughes B; Herman MV; Revkin JH; Therrien ML; Petrillo MK; Krumholz HM Conn Med; 1997 Mar; 61(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 9097486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A collaborative project in Connecticut to improve the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Vaccarino LV; Gottlieb LD; McGovern-Hughes B; Herman MV; Revkin JH; Therrien ML; Petrillo MK; Krumholz HM Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1996 Nov; 22(11):751-61. PubMed ID: 8937949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a multihospital collaborative QI project. Metersky ML; Galusha DH; Meehan TP Conn Med; 1999 Jul; 63(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 10461412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A statewide collaborative initiative to improve the quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Brush JE; Rensing E; Song F; Cook S; Lynch J; Thacker L; Gurram S; Bonow RO; Brough J; Valentine CM Circulation; 2009 Mar; 119(12):1609-15. PubMed ID: 19289632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project in Oklahoma. Bratzler DW; de Leon AC; Johnson MC; Oehlert WH; Slagle RC; Murray CK; Bumpus LJ; Webb J J Okla State Med Assoc; 1997; 90(6):219-27. PubMed ID: 9299892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved adherence to Swedish national guidelines for acute myocardial infarction: the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) study. Carlhed R; Bojestig M; Wallentin L; Lindström G; Peterson A; Aberg C; Lindahl B; Am Heart J; 2006 Dec; 152(6):1175-81. PubMed ID: 17161072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's happening in quality improvement at the local hospital: a state-wide study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Holmboe ES; Meehan TP; Radford MJ; Wang Y; Krumholz HM Am J Med Qual; 2000; 15(3):106-13. PubMed ID: 10872260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving care for acute myocardial infarction: experience from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project Best Practices Working Group. Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Sep; 24(9):480-90. PubMed ID: 9770638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data feedback and clinical process improvement in acute myocardial infarction. Zhang H; Alexander JA; Luttrell J; O'Connor GT; Daley J; Paris M Am Heart J; 2005 May; 149(5):856-61. PubMed ID: 15894968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: shifting the focus of improvement from key indicators to process of care and tool use: the American College of Cardiology Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice Project in Michigan: Flint and Saginaw Expansion. Mehta RH; Montoye CK; Faul J; Nagle DJ; Kure J; Raj E; Fattal P; Sharrif S; Amlani M; Changezi HU; Skorcz S; Bailey N; Bourque T; LaTarte M; McLean D; Savoy S; Werner P; Baker PL; DeFranco A; Eagle KA; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(12):2166-73. PubMed ID: 15193675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimizing systems of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. STEMI networks, telemetry ECG, and standardized quality improvement with systematic data feedback]. Scholz KH; von Knobelsdorff G; Ahlersmann D; Keating FK; Jung J; Werner GS; Nitsche R; Duwald H; Hilgers R Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18344028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of organizational infrastructure on beta-blocker and aspirin therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Ellerbeck EF; Bhimaraj A; Hall S Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 16923434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in acute myocardial infarction in 4 US states between 1992 and 2001: clinical characteristics, quality of care, and outcomes. Masoudi FA; Foody JM; Havranek EP; Wang Y; Radford MJ; Allman RM; Gold J; Wiblin RT; Krumholz HM Circulation; 2006 Dec; 114(25):2806-14. PubMed ID: 17145994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuous quality improvement and the acute myocardial infarction patient. Penney JB; Kolevar CM Crit Care Nurse; 1993 Apr; 13(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 8453874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delay in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: effect on quality of care and its assessment. Graff LG; Wang Y; Borkowski B; Tuozzo K; Foody JM; Krumholz HM; Radford MJ Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):931-8. PubMed ID: 16894002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National and state trends in quality of care for acute myocardial infarction between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999: the medicare health care quality improvement program. Burwen DR; Galusha DH; Lewis JM; Bedinger MR; Radford MJ; Krumholz HM; Foody JM Arch Intern Med; 2003 Jun; 163(12):1430-9. PubMed ID: 12824092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Marciniak TA; Ellerbeck EF; Radford MJ; Kresowik TF; Gold JA; Krumholz HM; Kiefe CI; Allman RM; Vogel RA; Jencks SF JAMA; 1998 May; 279(17):1351-7. PubMed ID: 9582042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A framework for quality improvement: an analysis of factors responsible for improvement at hospitals participating in the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative. Glickman SW; Boulding W; Staelin R; Mulgund J; Roe MT; Lytle BL; Rumsfeld JS; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Schulman KA; Peterson ED Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1206-20. PubMed ID: 18035096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Educating the provider community about the new role of the peer review organization. Clark JD; Williams DE Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 10135641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes. Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]