These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9097652)

  • 21. [Computer-assisted audiometry].
    Arifov SS; Razhabov FF; Khasanov AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001; (1):30-2. PubMed ID: 11247243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Age-related aspects of pure tone threshold in extended band by air].
    Levina IuV; Kunel'skaia NL; Ivanets IV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003; (2):12-3. PubMed ID: 12958852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Correlation of auditory brainstem evoked potentials and pure tone audiometric thresholds].
    Martínez Ibarguen A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 8357628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evaluation of a method of hearing screening in school children].
    Salvadó A; Salfate J; Araya J
    Rev Chil Pediatr; 1988; 59(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 3238090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Electronic organization for hearing, voice and speech studies at the Graz University HNO Clinic].
    Horwath T
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):169-72. PubMed ID: 16114387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to eliminate air-bone gaps audiometrically: use too much masking.
    Miller MH
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 May; 87(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 18572783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Subjective evaluation of post-tympanoplasty hearing in relation to the pure tone threshold.
    Baba S; Fujikura T; Pawankar R; Yagi T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 15571906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pseudohypacusis.
    Rintelmann WF; Schwan SA; Blakley BW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 1857618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiometry: masking.
    Hamid MA; Brookler KH
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Oct; 85(10):646-7. PubMed ID: 17124933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification].
    Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of self recording audiometry in naval establishments and clinical audiometry in a hospital setting.
    Frampton MC; Counter RT
    J R Nav Med Serv; 1989; 75(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 2607503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictive value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked responses in surgery for conductive hearing losses.
    Selesnick SH; Victor JD; Tikoo RK; Eisenman DJ
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jan; 18(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 8989945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method.
    Karlsmose B; Pedersen HB; Lauritzen T; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9728773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The audioanalysator. A bridge between audiometry and psychoacoustics].
    Schlitt H; Wullstein HL; Wullstein SR
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 May; 64(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 4021674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How we do it: tympanoplasty: are different three- and four-frequency averages comparable?
    Dawes PJ; Welch D; Lee P
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 31(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 16911654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcomes for conservative management of traumatic conductive hearing loss.
    Grant JR; Arganbright J; Friedland DR
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Apr; 29(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 18317393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Brain stem audiometry and unconventional audiometry in small children--a comparison with pure-tone audiometry performed at a later time].
    Jensen JH; Ostri BJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Apr; 153(15):1055-7. PubMed ID: 2024330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions.
    Kimberley BP; Kimberley BM; Roth L
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Nov; 73(11):812-3, 817-23. PubMed ID: 7828474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.