These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9097752)

  • 21. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields.
    Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Chan K; Boden C; Lee TW; Vasile C; Boehm AG; Sejnowski T; Johnson CA; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2660-5. PubMed ID: 12147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis.
    McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1996 Jul; 234(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 8817283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma.
    de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.
    Quigley HA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 9645719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
    Stewart WC
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Feb; 70(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1557979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Objective perimetry in glaucoma.
    Klistorner A; Graham SL
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2283-99. PubMed ID: 11097611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantification of interpoint topographic correlations of threshold values in glaucomatous visual fields.
    González de la Rosa M; González-Hernández M; Abraldes M; Azuara-Blanco A
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Feb; 11(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 11821687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Glaucoma monitoring in a clinical setting: glaucoma progression analysis vs nonparametric progression analysis in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 127(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 19273789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal visual field in glaucoma: a re-evaluation in the automated perimetry era.
    Pennebaker GE; Stewart WC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 1577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distribution and Progression of Visual Field Defects With Binocular Vision in Glaucoma.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Iwase A; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):519-524. PubMed ID: 29557827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
    Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
    Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma.
    De Moraes CG; Juthani VJ; Liebmann JM; Teng CC; Tello C; Susanna R; Ritch R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 129(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 21555607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; Bates AB; Turpin A; Chauhan BC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11831919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Progressive optic disc change: implications for clinical practice and trial design.
    Chauhan BC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 127(10):1382-3. PubMed ID: 19822858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.