These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9099070)

  • 1. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.
    Paquet L; Lortie C
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 2243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.
    Rouder JN; King JW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 12713244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.
    Paquet L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 11495118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes.
    Cohen A; Shoup R
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Mar; 32(2):128-81. PubMed ID: 9095680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual grouping of objects occupied by target and flankers affects target-flanker interference.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 26404531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Eriksen flanker effect revisited.
    Sanders AF; Lamers JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jan; 109(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11766139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual organization at attended and unattended locations.
    Han S; Humphreys GW
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2005 Apr; 48(2):106-16. PubMed ID: 15986883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bimodal extension of the Eriksen flanker task.
    Ulrich R; Prislan L; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):790-799. PubMed ID: 33179215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing lateral interaction from uncertainty reduction in collinear flanker effect on contrast discrimination.
    Wu CC; Chen CC
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):8.1-14. PubMed ID: 20377285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How hand placement modulates interference from extraneous stimuli.
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):340-52. PubMed ID: 25239096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can new objects override attentional control settings?
    Folk CL; Remington R
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):727-39. PubMed ID: 10370339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitation and inhibition mechanisms of human visuospatial attention in a non-search task.
    Facoetti A
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jan; 298(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11154832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration.
    Schoenherr JR; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 20139451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Servant M; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.