These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9099180)

  • 1. Use of a decibel threshold in detecting Doppler embolic signals.
    Markus HS; Molloy J
    Stroke; 1997 Apr; 28(4):692-5. PubMed ID: 9099180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intercenter agreement in reading Doppler embolic signals. A multicenter international study.
    Markus HS; Ackerstaff R; Babikian V; Bladin C; Droste D; Grosset D; Levi C; Russell D; Siebler M; Tegeler C
    Stroke; 1997 Jul; 28(7):1307-10. PubMed ID: 9227673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of Doppler embolic signals: psychoacoustic considerations.
    Chung E; Fan L; Degg C; Evans DH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1177-84. PubMed ID: 16176785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency filtering improves ultrasonic embolic signal detection.
    Markus HS; Reid G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jun; 25(5):857-60. PubMed ID: 10414903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of new online automated embolic signal detection algorithm, including comparison with panel of international experts.
    Cullinane M; Reid G; Dittrich R; Kaposzta Z; Ackerstaff R; Babikian V; Droste DW; Grossett D; Siebler M; Valton L; Markus HS
    Stroke; 2000 Jun; 31(6):1335-41. PubMed ID: 10835453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of time-window overlap in the detection and analysis of embolic signals.
    Markus H
    Stroke; 1995 Nov; 26(11):2044-7. PubMed ID: 7482647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How good is intercenter agreement in the identification of embolic signals in carotid artery disease?
    Markus H; Bland JM; Rose G; Sitzer M; Siebler M
    Stroke; 1996 Jul; 27(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 8685937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved automated detection of embolic signals using a novel frequency filtering approach.
    Markus H; Cullinane M; Reid G
    Stroke; 1999 Aug; 30(8):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10436109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of velocity on the appearance of embolic signals studied in transcranial Doppler models.
    Droste DW; Markus HS; Nassiri D; Brown MM
    Stroke; 1994 May; 25(5):986-91. PubMed ID: 7909392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system.
    Markus HS; Punter M
    Stroke; 2005 Aug; 36(8):1731-4. PubMed ID: 16020767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro model.
    Markus HS; Brown MM
    Stroke; 1993 Jan; 24(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of four methods for distinguishing Doppler signals from gaseous and particulate emboli.
    Smith JL; Evans DH; Bell PR; Naylor AR
    Stroke; 1998 Jun; 29(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9626284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals with Doppler ultrasound.
    Markus HS; Droste DW; Brown MM
    Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8904):1011-2. PubMed ID: 7909051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in occurrence of embolic signals in long term transcranial Doppler recordings.
    Droste DW; Decker W; Siemens HJ; Kaps M; Schulte-Altedorneburg G
    Neurol Res; 1996 Feb; 18(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of variability in the detection of cerebral emboli with transcranial Doppler during cardiac surgery.
    Rodriguez RA; Rubens F; Rodriguez CD; Nathan HJ
    J Neuroimaging; 2006 Apr; 16(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 16629734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of the wavelet transform to describe embolic signals.
    Aydin N; Padayachee S; Markus HS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 25(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 10461724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with a similar bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Braekken SK; Russell D; Brucher R; Svennevig J
    Stroke; 1995 Jul; 26(7):1225-30. PubMed ID: 7604419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of embolic signals using Doppler ultrasound: a new approach to cardiac embolism.
    Pettelot G; Bracco J; Gibelin P; Baudouy M; Barrillon D; Morand P
    Int J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 58(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9021422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to distinguish between gaseous and solid cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Rodriguez RA; Nathan HJ; Ruel M; Rubens F; Dafoe D; Mesana T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18952455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals in patients with carotid stenosis. Correlation with appearance of plaque ulceration on angiography.
    Valton L; Larrue V; Arrué P; Géraud G; Bès A
    Stroke; 1995 May; 26(5):813-5. PubMed ID: 7740572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.