These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9099561)

  • 1. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorder using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9099561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequence stimuli.
    Slaven A; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9562532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences.
    Hine JE; Ho CT; Slaven A; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):104-14. PubMed ID: 11377886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15855037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of olivocochlear bundle section on evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR; Brookes GB
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):28-36. PubMed ID: 9213119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation into the relationship between input-output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences.
    Lineton B; Thornton AR; Baker VJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 16839721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in new-borns: normative data.
    Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Fetoni AR; Zuppa AA; Tortorolo G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 10321778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interaction between ear and sex differences and stimulus rate.
    Ismail H; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12742242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences.
    Rasmussen AN; Osterhammel PA; Johannesen PT; Borgkvist B
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Dec; 32(6):355-66. PubMed ID: 10064418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of stimulus rate on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Thornton AR; Slaven A
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7660059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient-evoked and 2F1-F2 distortion product oto-acoustic emissions in dogs: preliminary findings.
    Sockalingam R; Filippich L; Sommerlad S; Murdoch B; Charles B
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(6):373-85. PubMed ID: 9732131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12031522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons.
    Bertoli S; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 9288474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():91-9. PubMed ID: 8234771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat.
    Khvoles R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 8844192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral and ipsilateral 'suppression' of evoked otoacoustic emissions at high stimulation rates.
    Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):227-34. PubMed ID: 7735151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instrumentation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences.
    Johannesen PT; Rasmussen AN; Osterhammel PA
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9505290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.