BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9100722)

  • 1. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno JM; Licks S; Lynn J; Wenger N; Connors AF; Phillips RS; O'Connor MA; Murphy DP; Fulkerson WJ; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 9100722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Alzola C; Murphy DP; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 9100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data.
    Teno JM; Stevens M; Spernak S; Lynn J
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Jul; 13(7):439-46. PubMed ID: 9686709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness.
    Schneiderman LJ; Pearlman RA; Kaplan RM; Anderson JP; Rosenberg EM
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):2114-22. PubMed ID: 1417386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in nursing homes in New York City.
    Mezey M; Mitty E; Rappaport M; Ramsey G
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Jan; 45(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 8994486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.
    Sam M; Singer PA
    CMAJ; 1993 May; 148(9):1497-502. PubMed ID: 8477368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Wenger NS; Oye RK; Bellamy PE; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Desbiens NA; Kussin P; Youngner SJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Oct; 9(10):539-43. PubMed ID: 7823223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A messy necessary end: Health care proxies need our support.
    Goldblatt D
    Neurology; 2001 Jan; 56(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 11236759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing utilization of life-sustaining treatments with patient and public preferences.
    Alpert HR; Emanuel L
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Mar; 13(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 9541374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advance directives and life-sustaining treatment: a legal primer.
    Basanta WE
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 16(6):1381-96. PubMed ID: 12512173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.
    Silveira MJ; Kim SY; Langa KM
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Apr; 362(13):1211-8. PubMed ID: 20357283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs.
    Schneiderman LJ; Kronick R; Kaplan RM; Anderson JP; Langer RD
    Ann Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 117(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 1524334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [General practice of advance directives in the USA].
    Zülicke F
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):139-44. PubMed ID: 9214151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of state advance directive documents.
    Gunter-Hunt G; Mahoney JE; Sieger CE
    Gerontologist; 2002 Feb; 42(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 11815699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term care facility policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.
    Choudhry NK; Ma J; Rasooly I; Singer PA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1994 Nov; 42(11):1150-3. PubMed ID: 7963200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advance directives compatible with Catholic moral principles.
    Hamel RP
    Health Prog; 1988 Apr; 69(3):36-40, 88. PubMed ID: 10286449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care.
    Yadav KN; Gabler NB; Cooney E; Kent S; Kim J; Herbst N; Mante A; Halpern SD; Courtright KR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Jul; 36(7):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 28679811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.