These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9100788)

  • 1. Cytologic atypia. Clinical significance and follow-up recommendations.
    Quitllet FA; Morta MC; Cañas A; Castellanos E; Carreras R
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):504-6. PubMed ID: 9100788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic damage in exfoliated cells of the uterine cervix. Association and interaction between cigarette smoking and progression to malignant transformation?
    Cerqueira EM; Santoro CL; Donozo NF; Freitas BA; Pereira CA; Bevilacqua RG; Machado-Santelli GM
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 9622681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The significance of marked nuclear atypia in grade 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Fadare O; Rodriguez R
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Oct; 40(10):1487-93. PubMed ID: 19540559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of mild cytologic atypia in women infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
    Wright TC; Moscarelli RD; Dole P; Ellerbrock TV; Chiasson MA; VanDevanter N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 87(4):515-9. PubMed ID: 8602301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cervix smears with mild atypia classified as Pap-class IIIA: results of a changed policy].
    Doornewaard H; Woudt JM; Sie-Go DM; Kooijman CD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Sep; 135(36):1642-5. PubMed ID: 1922503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inflammatory atypia. An apparent link with subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia explained by cytologic underreading.
    Frisch LE
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(6):869-72. PubMed ID: 3425146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of uterine cervical cytology and biopsy results: indications and outcomes for colposcopy.
    Swinker M; Cutlip AC; Ogle D
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
    Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
    Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
    Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artifactual endocervical atypia induced by endocervical brush collection.
    Fiorella RM; Casafrancisco D; Yokota S; Kragel PJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):79-83; discussion 83-4. PubMed ID: 7956667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
    Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cytologic evidence or biopsy results by board-certified gynecologists.
    Lee C; Mancuso V; Contant T; Jackson R; Smith-Mccune K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 12634642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Geier CS; Wilson M; Creasman W
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 11174481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: validity of cytologic study, cervicography, and human papillomavirus detection.
    Schneider A; Zahm DM; Kirchmayr R; Schneider VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 174(5):1534-41. PubMed ID: 9065125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
    Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.