These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9100818)
21. Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances. Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Ooshima K; Hayashi T; Komano T; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Takatsu A; Nishiyama N Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22743076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Strategy Combining Nonanimal Methods for Ocular Toxicity Evaluation. Valadares MC; de Oliveira GAR; de Ávila RI; da Silva ACG Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2240():175-195. PubMed ID: 33423234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Isolated Chicken Eye test to replace the Draize test in rabbits. Prinsen MK; Hendriksen CFM; Krul CAM; Woutersen RA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():132-149. PubMed ID: 28192172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Recent progress in the eye irritation test. Chu IH; Toft P Toxicol Ind Health; 1993; 9(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 8191500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CON4EI: CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy. Van Rompay AR; Verstraelen S; Blaauboer BJ Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():1. PubMed ID: 29685209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perspectives on alternatives to the eye irritation test: industry, public interest, government. Bruner LH; Spira H; Balls M; Hill RN Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):165-6. PubMed ID: 9100819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro alternatives for ocular irritation. Curren RD; Harbell JW Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Apr; 106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):485-92. PubMed ID: 9599696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of a defined approach for eye irritation or serious eye damage for neat liquids based on cosmetics Europe analysis of in vitro RhCE and BCOP test methods. Alépée N; Adriaens E; Abo T; Bagley D; Desprez B; Hibatallah J; Mewes K; Pfannenbecker U; Sala À; Van Rompay AR; Verstraelen S; McNamee P Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Sep; 59():100-114. PubMed ID: 30981694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test]. Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang LS; Li GM; Zhang BX Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Sep; 35(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 15460411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new cell-based method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals: an alternative to the Draize test. Cho SA; An S; Lee E; Shin K; Cho JC; Lee TR Toxicol Lett; 2012 Jul; 212(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 22595615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CON4EI: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (EpiOcular™ EIT) for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals. Kandarova H; Letasiova S; Adriaens E; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Drzewiecka A; Gruszka K; Alépée N; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():21-33. PubMed ID: 28697962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of low-volume dosing in the eye irritation test. Lambert LA; Chambers WA; Green S; Gupta KC; Hill RN; Hurley PM; Lee CC; Lee JK; Liu PT; Lowther DK Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8449463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes. Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alternatives to ocular irritation testing in animals. Atkinson KA; Fentem JH; Clothier RH; Balls M Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):247-58. PubMed ID: 1301784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations by the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Cater KC; Harbell JW Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2006; 25(3):217-33. PubMed ID: 16980247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies. Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of low volume, draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. II. Oil/water emulsions. Gettings SD; Lordo RA; Feder PI; Hintze KL Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 9487363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short Time Exposure (STE) test in conjunction with Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay including histopathology to evaluate correspondence with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation classification of textile dyes. Oliveira GA; Ducas Rdo N; Teixeira GC; Batista AC; Oliveira DP; Valadares MC Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Sep; 29(6):1283-8. PubMed ID: 26026500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lacking applicability of in vitro eye irritation methods to identify seriously eye irritating agrochemical formulations: Results of bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay, isolated chicken eye test and the EpiOcular™ ET-50 method to classify according to UN GHS. Kolle SN; Van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():33-47. PubMed ID: 28163171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Extent of corneal injury as a biomarker for hazard assessment and the development of alternative models to the Draize rabbit eye test. Jester JV Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2006; 25(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 16702053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]