These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
34. Voice profile after type I or II laser chordectomies for T1a glottic carcinoma. Sjögren EV; van Rossum MA; Langeveld TP; Voerman MS; van de Kamp VA; Baatenburg de Jong RJ Head Neck; 2009 Nov; 31(11):1502-10. PubMed ID: 19431198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample. Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task. Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Subjective and objective evaluation of voice quality in patients with asthma. Dogan M; Eryuksel E; Kocak I; Celikel T; Sehitoglu MA J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 16504474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery. Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mutational falsetto: intervention outcomes in 45 patients. Dagli M; Sati I; Acar A; Stone RE; Dursun G; Eryilmaz A J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Mar; 122(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 17524172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab. Smits I; Ceuppens P; De Bodt MS J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15907433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]