These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9103793)

  • 21. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
    Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.
    Friedlander LT; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths.
    Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 May; 81(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 8734712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.
    Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
    Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
    Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
    Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of D-, E-, and F-speed conventional intraoral radiographic films in endodontic measurement.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 11925545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image quality of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.
    Peretz B
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jul; 24(3):96. PubMed ID: 17091627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loss of diagnostic information in digital images.
    Molteni R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):312. PubMed ID: 9890795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of scale standardization on images of digital radiography systems.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Nov; 26(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 9482009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.