These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9103804)

  • 1. Peer review and antitrust.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 9103804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laws governing peer immunity, physician credentialing upheld.
    Senft DJ
    Manag Care; 2002 Feb; 11(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 11904916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical staff credentialing: a prescription for reducing antitrust liability.
    Peters BM; Maneval WC
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):120-33. PubMed ID: 1895761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Special report on health care delivery systems and medical staff relationships. Peer review in the era of integrated delivery systems: it's time for some massive paradigm shifts.
    Brown LC
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Jun; 9(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 10134404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
    Acevedo LJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antitrust protection extended to hospital authorities and physician peer review participants. Crosby v. Hospital Authority of Valdosta.
    Roeder KH; Sledge SK
    Ga Hosp Today; 1996 Nov; 40(11):3. PubMed ID: 10184649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HCQIA immunity: one win and one loss.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Aug; 21(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 15354911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review immunity? Think again: recent developments in federal and state law.
    Spevak C
    Physician Exec; 2007; 33(3):76-8. PubMed ID: 17539569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Civil rights claims and physician peer review.
    Kadzielski M; Marino SP
    Cost Qual Q J; 1999 Jun; 5(2):10-4. PubMed ID: 10539004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Special report on medical staff relationships. Ninth Circuit buttresses peer review immunities.
    Penner I
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Nov; 9(11):15-20. PubMed ID: 10137766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A conflict of interest: why peer review committees need heightened scrutiny under federal antitrust law.
    Rakestraw E
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):563-78. PubMed ID: 19953408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limiting act's protection of physicians defeats aim of patient protection.
    Gittleman EP
    J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 8130838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.