506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9103988)
21. What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function.
Iwata BA; Pace GM; Cowdery GE; Miltenberger RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 8188555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Brief report: Signals enhance the suppressive effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Christensen T; Boelter EW
J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Mar; 40(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 19777331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
Virues-Ortega J; Iwata BA; Fahmie TA; Harper JM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 24114223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of noncontingent sensory reinforcement, contingent sensory reinforcement, and response interruption on stereotypical and self-injurious behavior.
Sprague J; Holland K; Thomas K
Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 9085430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Worsdell AS; Hanley GP
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12723863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An empirical analysis of two forms of extinction to treat aggression.
O'Reilly M; Lancioni G; Taylor I
Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(5):315-25. PubMed ID: 10542967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications.
Phillips CL; Iannaccone JA; Rooker GW; Hagopian LP
J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):357-376. PubMed ID: 28177118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets.
Hagopian LP; Fisher WW; Legacy SM
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 8063630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior.
Fischer SM; Iwata BA; Mazaleski JL
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9210304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction.
Saini V; Fisher WW; Pisman MD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):377-392. PubMed ID: 28276578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment.
Fisher W; Piazza C; Cataldo M; Harrell R; Jefferson G; Conner R
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 8473256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.
Goh HL; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 10885527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.
Pace GM; Iwata BA; Cowdery GE; Andree PJ; McIntyre T
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 8331017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
Lalli JS; Kates K
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
