These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9104022)

  • 1. Psychoacoustical evaluation of the pitch-synchronous overlap-and-add speech-waveform manipulation technique using single-formant stimuli.
    Kortekaas RW; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2202-13. PubMed ID: 9104022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychoacoustical evaluation of PSOLA. II. Double-formant stimuli and the role of vocal perturbation.
    Kortekaas RW; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):522-35. PubMed ID: 9921675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.
    Mathias SR; Micheyl C; Bailey PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3026-37. PubMed ID: 21117752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formant frequency discrimination by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).
    Sommers MS; Moody DB; Prosen CA; Stebbins WC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3499-510. PubMed ID: 1619126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formant-frequency matching between sounds with different bandwidths and on different fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 11508966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Principal pitch of frequency-modulated tones with asymmetrical modulation waveform: a comparison of models.
    Etchemendy PE; Eguia MC; Mesz B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 24606273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: contour and pitch height.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):1983-8. PubMed ID: 8227742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deficits of congenital amusia beyond pitch: Evidence from impaired categorical perception of vowels in Cantonese-speaking congenital amusics.
    Zhang C; Shao J; Huang X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183151. PubMed ID: 28829808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform.
    He NJ; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77. PubMed ID: 17614504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting pitch-pulse asynchronies and differences in fundamental frequency.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):968-79. PubMed ID: 8132911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of formant amplitude in the perception of /i/ and /u/.
    Kiefte M; Enright T; Marshall L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2611-21. PubMed ID: 20370042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency and duration discrimination of short first-formant speechlike transitions.
    van Wieringen A; Pols LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):502-11. PubMed ID: 8120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.