These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 910416)

  • 1. In vitro comparison between the hydrodynamic characteristics of the Hancock 250 (modified orifice) xenografts and the Björk-Shiley aortic valve prostheses.
    Wright JT
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1977; 23():89-94. PubMed ID: 910416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro comparison of properties of aortic allotransplants and the Björk-Shiley valve].
    Vrsanský D; Simkovic I
    Rozhl Chir; 1991 Feb; 70(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 1925786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pulsatile flow study comparing the Hancock porcine xenograft aortic valve prostheses models 242 and 250.
    Wright JT
    Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 859469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
    Williams GA; Labovitz AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design of a system for the accelerated loading of heart valve prostheses.
    Rousseau EP; van de Ven AP; van Steenhoven AA; Seroo JM
    J Biomech; 1984; 17(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 6725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Six month postoperative hemodynamics of the Hancock heterograft and the Björk-Shiley prosthesis: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative prospective randomized trial.
    Khuri SF; Folland ED; Sethi GK; Souchek J; Oprian C; Wong M; Burchfiel C; Henderson WG; Hammermeister KE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jul; 12(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 3288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro closing behaviour of Björk-Shiley, St Jude and Hancock heart valve prostheses in relation to the in vivo recorded aortic valve closure.
    van Steenhoven AA; van Duppen TJ; Cauwenberg JW; van Renterghem RJ
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 7161286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock porcine xenograft.
    Cohn LH; Sanders JH; Collins JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1976 Sep; 22(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 962405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Oxenham H; Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Lee RJ; Cunningham J; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
    Heart; 2003 Jul; 89(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 12807838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and hemodynamic comparisons of Kay-Shiley, Starr-Edwards No. 6520, and Reis-Hancock porcine xenograft mitral valves.
    Brown JW; Myerowitz PD; Cann MS; Colvin SB; McIntosh CL; Morrow AG
    Surgery; 1974 Dec; 76(6):983-91. PubMed ID: 4473843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Björk-Shiley prosthetic values.
    Sagar KB; Wann LS; Paulsen WH; Romhilt DW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 3950245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics.
    Yoganathan AP; Sung HW; Woo YR; Jones M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position.
    Kaul TK; Mercer JL
    Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronic intravascular hemolysis after aortic valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley xenograft: comparative study with Bjork-Shiley prosthesis.
    Febres-Roman PR; Bourg WC; Crone RA; Davis RC; Williams TH
    Am J Cardiol; 1980 Nov; 46(5):735-8. PubMed ID: 7435383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer simulation: a diagnostic method in comparative studies of valve prostheses.
    Engelman MS; Moskowitz SE; Borman JB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Mar; 79(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 7354636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of a comparative in vitro study of Duromedics and Björk-Shiley monostrut mitral heart valve prostheses.
    Heiliger R; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Apr; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 3573751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic results of aortic valvular replacement with the porcine xenograft valve.
    Morris DC; King SB; Douglas JS; Wickliffe CW; Jones EL
    Circulation; 1977 Nov; 56(5):841-4. PubMed ID: 562239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.