These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9104710)

  • 1. The effect of filler content and processing variables on dimensional accuracy of experimental composite inlay material.
    Razak AA; Harrison A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9104710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Rechenberg DK; Göhring TN; Attin T
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of post-cure treatments on hardness and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlay restorations: an in vitro study.
    Poskus LT; Latempa AM; Chagas MA; Silva EM; Leal MP; Guimarães JG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 20027437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions.
    Kildal KK; Ruyter IE
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Aug; 105(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 9298368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M
    J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 9540314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of curing time, overlay material and thickness on three light-curing composites used for luting indirect composite restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; Carluccio F; Vitalone LM; D'Amario M
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22282760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin.
    Price RB; Rizkalla AS; Hall GC
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 11763926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin.
    de Menezes MJ; Arrais CA; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16911888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ceramic thickness and curing mode on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements.
    Lee IB; An W; Chang J; Um CM
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18433858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct composite resin inlay.
    Biederman JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Sep; 62(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 2681690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical properties of self-, dual-, and light-cured direct core materials.
    Rüttermann S; Alberts I; Raab WH; Janda RR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20372950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.