These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9104719)

  • 1. Effects of radiofrequency glow discharge on impression material surface wettability.
    Hesby RM; Haganman CR; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 77(4):414-22. PubMed ID: 9104719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of chlorine-based and quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants on the wettability of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Kang YS; Rueggeberg F; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):266-270. PubMed ID: 27765401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials following chemical disinfection, autoclave and microwave sterilization.
    Al Kheraif AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24171994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coating of silicone-based impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrylic acid plasma.
    Ozden N; Ayhan H; Erkut S; Can G; Pişkin E
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 9758971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disinfection of polyvinyl siloxane impression material by gaseous ozone.
    Celebi H; Büyükerkmen EB; Torlak E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 29310874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiofrequency Glow Discharge as a Mode of Disinfection for Elastomeric Impression Materials.
    Mathew S; Alani MM; Nair KN; Haridas S; Reba PB; Thomas SA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 28174366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wettability, imbibition, and mass change of disinfected low-viscosity impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC; Stroh GS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 12426496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static and dynamic evaluations of the wettability of commercial vinyl polysiloxane impression materials for artificial saliva.
    Luo F; Hong G; Wang T; Jia L; Chen JY; Suo L; Pei XB; Wan QB
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):818-824. PubMed ID: 29962413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The disinfection of impression materials by using microwave irradiation and hydrogen peroxide.
    Choi YR; Kim KN; Kim KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 24819529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M; Ziegler C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.