158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9104826)
1. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation.
Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
Med Eng Phys; 1999 Apr; 21(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 10468356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Realistic human head model for EEG from both the geometry and conductivity aspects.
Wen P; Pope K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12854618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem--a simulation study.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Heethaar RM; Lopes da Silva FH; van Dijk BW
Physiol Meas; 2000 Aug; 21(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 10984206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
Oostendorp TF; Delbeke J; Stegeman DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 11077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison study of different head model structures with homogeneous/inhomogeneous conductivity.
Wen P; Li Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11458570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
