These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9105186)

  • 1. Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method.
    D'Orsi CJ; Kopans DB
    Am Fam Physician; 1997 Apr; 55(5):1548-50, 1552. PubMed ID: 9105186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and meaning of appropriateness guidelines.
    Mendelson EB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 7480657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BI-RADS: revised and replicated.
    Ellenbogen PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jan; 11(1):2. PubMed ID: 24387960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Problems with the American College of Radiology Standard for Diagnostic Mammography.
    Eklund GW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1370-1. PubMed ID: 7484566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree?
    Heilbrunn KS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):593-4. PubMed ID: 8109502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic screening and reporting: a need for standardisation. A review.
    Akhigbe AO; Igbinedion BO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2013 Dec; 20(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 24633281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening mammography reports. Toward clear, concise clinical descriptions.
    Hindle WH
    West J Med; 1992 Aug; 157(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 1441465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New FDA guidance on electronic records and signatures.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Nov; 12(9):32-5. PubMed ID: 12938536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BI-RADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49-year-old women.
    McKay C; Hart CL; Erbacher G
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Oct; 100(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 11105450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography lexicon.
    Hindle WH
    Womens Health Issues; 1992; 2(3):165. PubMed ID: 1422247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and selection decisions in the practice of screening mammography.
    Stewart TR; Mumpower JL
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2004 Aug; 23(4):908-20. PubMed ID: 15505941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties.
    Stines J
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17178447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. American College of Radiology mammography accreditation guidelines.
    Wilcox PA
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1991 Apr; 5(4):19. PubMed ID: 1831035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening in women 40 to 49 years old.
    Léger MM; McNellis R;
    JAAPA; 2007 Nov; 20(11):16, 18. PubMed ID: 18035758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography and breast imaging reporting and data system on breast diseases].
    Li JG; Li S; Liu Q; Zhao TT
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 45(7):464-6. PubMed ID: 17686303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-field digital mammography. A candid assessment.
    Lewin JM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):40-5. PubMed ID: 10623316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A healthcare controlled vocabulary. A case is made for standardizing medical terminology.
    Davis NM
    J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1996; 15(3):33, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 10184538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.