These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9107208)

  • 1. Development and testing of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey summary scale scores in the United Kingdom. Results from a large-scale survey and a clinical trial.
    Jenkinson C; Layte R; Lawrence K
    Med Care; 1997 Apr; 35(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 9107208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction and validation of an alternate form general mental health scale for the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey.
    McHorney CA; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 7823644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability.
    Kosinski M; Keller SD; Hatoum HT; Kong SX; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5 Suppl):MS10-22. PubMed ID: 10335740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of evaluation in outcomes research.
    Reed PJ
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 4(11):1616-25; quiz 1626-7. PubMed ID: 10338907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
    Ware JE; Kosinski M; Bayliss MS; McHorney CA; Rogers WH; Raczek A
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4 Suppl):AS264-79. PubMed ID: 7723455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of index and profile measures of health status in a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol, and disease specific measures.
    Jenkinson C; Gray A; Doll H; Lawrence K; Keoghane S; Layte R
    Med Care; 1997 Nov; 35(11):1109-18. PubMed ID: 9366890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: relative validity of scales in relation to clinical measures of arthritis severity.
    Kosinski M; Keller SD; Ware JE; Hatoum HT; Kong SX
    Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5 Suppl):MS23-39. PubMed ID: 10335741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should aggregate scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey be used to assess quality of life in knee and hip osteoarthritis? A national survey in primary care.
    Rannou F; Boutron I; Jardinaud-Lopez M; Meric G; Revel M; Fermanian J; Poiraudeau S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Sep; 15(9):1013-8. PubMed ID: 17387025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.
    McHorney CA; Ware JE; Lu JF; Sherbourne CD
    Med Care; 1994 Jan; 32(1):40-66. PubMed ID: 8277801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the SF-36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults.
    Wolinsky FD; Wan GJ; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1998 Nov; 36(11):1589-98. PubMed ID: 9821946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical experiences in auditing patient outcomes.
    Bardsley MJ; Coles JM
    Qual Health Care; 1992 Jun; 1(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 10136842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomness in the RAWP formula: the reliability of mortality data in the allocation of National Health Service revenue.
    Palmer SR; West PA; Dodd P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1980 Sep; 34(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 7441144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.
    Hopman WM; Towheed T; Anastassiades T; Tenenhouse A; Poliquin S; Berger C; Joseph L; Brown JP; Murray TM; Adachi JD; Hanley DA; Papadimitropoulos E
    CMAJ; 2000 Aug; 163(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 10951722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL).
    Busija L; Pausenberger E; Haines TP; Haymes S; Buchbinder R; Osborne RH
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2011 Nov; 63 Suppl 11():S383-412. PubMed ID: 22588759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The MOS 36-item short form health survey. A conceptual analysis.
    Larson JS
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Mar; 20(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 10183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.
    Feeny D; Furlong W; Torrance GW; Goldsmith CH; Zhu Z; DePauw S; Denton M; Boyle M
    Med Care; 2002 Feb; 40(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 11802084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures. National survey.
    Gilbody SM; House AO; Sheldon TA
    Br J Psychiatry; 2002 Feb; 180():101-3. PubMed ID: 11823316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cross-national index of health care.
    Larson JS
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1986; 9(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 10281850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.
    Hays RD; Morales LS; Reise SP
    Med Care; 2000 Sep; 38(9 Suppl):II28-42. PubMed ID: 10982088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending the assessment of patient-centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis.
    Jones MC; Williams B; Rattray J; MacGillivray S; Baldie D; Abubakari AR; Coyle J; Mackie S; McKenna E
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jan; 27(1-2):65-76. PubMed ID: 28401693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.