294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9107636)
1. Bioimpedance analysis: evaluation of leg-to-leg system based on pressure contact footpad electrodes.
Nuñez C; Gallagher D; Visser M; Pi-Sunyer FX; Wang Z; Heymsfield SB
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Apr; 29(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 9107636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis.
Pietrobelli A; Rubiano F; St-Onge MP; Heymsfield SB
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Nov; 58(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 15138459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New electrode system for rapid whole-body and segmental bioimpedance assessment.
Tan YX; Nuñez C; Sun Y; Zhang K; Wang Z; Heymsfield SB
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Sep; 29(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 9309641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a leg-to-leg bioimpedance analysis system in assessing body composition in postmenopausal women.
Xie X; Kolthoff N; Bärenholt O; Nielsen SP
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1999 Oct; 23(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 10557029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the type of electrodes in the assessment of body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the supine position.
Dupertuis YM; Pereira AG; Karsegard VL; Hemmer A; Biolley E; Collet TH; Genton L
Clin Nutr; 2022 Nov; 41(11):2455-2463. PubMed ID: 36215865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximal electrode placement improves the estimation of body composition in obese and lean elderly during segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Yamada Y; Masuo Y; Yokoyama K; Hashii Y; Ando S; Okayama Y; Morimoto T; Kimura M; Oda S
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 Sep; 107(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 19533166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: prediction from multiple frequency segmental bioimpedance analysis.
Pietrobelli A; Morini P; Battistini N; Chiumello G; Nuñez C; Heymsfield SB
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1998 Jul; 52(7):507-11. PubMed ID: 9683333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioimpedance analysis: potential for measuring lower limb skeletal muscle mass.
Nuñez C; Gallagher D; Grammes J; Baumgartner RN; Ross R; Wang Z; Thornton J; Heymsfield SB
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1999; 23(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 10082000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioelectrical impedance is an accurate method to assess body composition in obese but not severely obese adolescents.
Verney J; Metz L; Chaplais E; Cardenoux C; Pereira B; Thivel D
Nutr Res; 2016 Jul; 36(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 27333957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper extremity skeletal muscle mass: potential of measurement with single frequency bioimpedance analysis.
Heymsfield SB; Gallagher D; Grammes J; Nuñez C; Wang Z; Pietrobelli A
Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):473-4. PubMed ID: 9580493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioelectrical impedance vs air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine body composition in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Flakoll PJ; Kent P; Neyra R; Levenhagen D; Chen KY; Ikizler TA
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 14763788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement between single-frequency bioimpedance analysis and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry varies based on sex and segmental mass.
Nickerson BS
Nutr Res; 2018 Jun; 54():33-39. PubMed ID: 29914665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance measurement in males.
Cable A; Nieman DC; Austin M; Hogen E; Utter AC
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2001 Sep; 41(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 11533575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21-82 years.
Malavolti M; Mussi C; Poli M; Fantuzzi AL; Salvioli G; Battistini N; Bedogni G
Ann Hum Biol; 2003; 30(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 12881138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of appendicular body composition in anorexic women.
Bedogni G; Marra M; Bianchi L; Malavolti M; Nicolai E; De Filippo E; Scalfi L
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Sep; 57(9):1068-72. PubMed ID: 12947424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling upper and lower limb muscle volume by bioelectrical impedance analysis.
Stahn A; Terblanche E; Strobel G
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Oct; 103(4):1428-35. PubMed ID: 17626831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate body composition in heart failure.
Alves FD; Souza GC; Biolo A; Clausell N
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Dec; 27(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 24684316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Body water compartment measurements: a comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis with tritium and sodium bromide dilution techniques.
Simpson JA; Lobo DN; Anderson JA; Macdonald IA; Perkins AC; Neal KR; Allison SP; Rowlands BJ
Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 20(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 11478832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl electrode effect.
Nescolarde L; Lukaski H; De Lorenzo A; de-Mateo-Silleras B; Redondo-Del-Río MP; Camina-Martín MA
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Dec; 70(12):1401-1407. PubMed ID: 27380885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.
Shafer KJ; Siders WA; Johnson LK; Lukaski HC
Nutrition; 2009 Jan; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18723322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
