These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9108017)

  • 1. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition.
    Buckle AM; Zahn R; Fersht AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Apr; 94(8):3571-5. PubMed ID: 9108017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended beta-strands and alpha-helices.
    Chatellier J; Buckle AM; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Sep; 292(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 10493865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From minichaperone to GroEL 1: information on GroEL-polypeptide interactions from crystal packing of minichaperones.
    Wang Q; Buckle AM; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):873-81. PubMed ID: 11124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A thermophilic mini-chaperonin contains a conserved polypeptide-binding surface: combined crystallographic and NMR studies of the GroEL apical domain with implications for substrate interactions.
    Hua Q; Dementieva IS; Walsh MA; Hallenga K; Weiss MA; Joachimiak A
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 306(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 11178910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach.
    Chaudhuri TK; Gupta P
    Cell Stress Chaperones; 2005; 10(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 15832945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL.
    Coyle JE; Jaeger J; Gross M; Robinson CV; Radford SE
    Fold Des; 1997; 2(6):R93-104. PubMed ID: 9427006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.
    Li Y; Gao X; Chen L
    J Biol Chem; 2009 Feb; 284(7):4324-31. PubMed ID: 19074438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding.
    Motojima F; Makio T; Aoki K; Makino Y; Kuwajima K; Yoshida M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2000 Jan; 267(3):842-9. PubMed ID: 10673379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity.
    Betancourt MR; Thirumalai D
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Apr; 287(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 10092464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural aspects of GroEL function.
    Horovitz A
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 1998 Feb; 8(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 9519301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A monomeric variant of GroEL binds nucleotides but is inactive as a molecular chaperone.
    White ZW; Fisher KE; Eisenstein E
    J Biol Chem; 1995 Sep; 270(35):20404-9. PubMed ID: 7657615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide.
    Wang J; Chen L
    J Mol Biol; 2003 Nov; 334(3):489-99. PubMed ID: 14623189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused heptamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL.
    Nojima T; Murayama S; Yoshida M; Motojima F
    J Biol Chem; 2008 Jun; 283(26):18385-92. PubMed ID: 18430731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL.
    Houry WA
    Biochem Cell Biol; 2001; 79(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 11716298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Productive folding of a tethered protein in the chaperonin GroEL-GroES cage.
    Motojima F; Yoshida M
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Oct; 466(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 26325470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Leu309 plays a critical role in the encapsulation of substrate protein into the internal cavity of GroEL.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Shimamura T; Yokoyama K; Yoshida M; Taguchi H
    J Biol Chem; 2006 Jan; 281(2):962-7. PubMed ID: 16239229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL.
    Zahn R; Buckle AM; Perrett S; Johnson CM; Corrales FJ; Golbik R; Fersht AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Dec; 93(26):15024-9. PubMed ID: 8986757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL.
    Wang Z; Feng Hp; Landry SJ; Maxwell J; Gierasch LM
    Biochemistry; 1999 Sep; 38(39):12537-46. PubMed ID: 10504222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein.
    Weaver J; Rye HS
    J Biol Chem; 2014 Aug; 289(33):23219-23232. PubMed ID: 24970895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.