185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9108742)
1. The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation.
Binon PP
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):419-33. PubMed ID: 9108742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the compressive strength of 3 different implant design systems.
Pedroza JE; Torrealba Y; Elias A; Psoter W
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17410905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.
Wiskott HW; Jaquet R; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 17465350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP; McHugh MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 8639238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
Weinberg LA; Kruger B
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
