BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9108748)

  • 1. The clinical assessment of a ceramic-coated transmucosal dental implant collar.
    Barclay CW; Last KS; Williams R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 9108748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.
    Andersson B; Glauser R; Maglione M; Taylor A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14714845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
    Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two applications of transmucosal milled ceramic in implantology: preliminary clinical examples.
    Marzouk J
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Aug; 27(8):533-47. PubMed ID: 9161257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of intracrevicular crown margins on gingival health: preliminary findings.
    Kancyper SG; Koka S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 11357072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.
    Andersson B; Taylor A; Lang BR; Scheller H; Schärer P; Sorensen JA; Tarnow D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 12066638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
    Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants.
    O'Mahony A; MacNeill SR; Cobb CM
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 11203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation data from a comparative dental implant investigation in dogs.
    Steflik DE; White SL; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Schoen SP; Lake FT; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 8120937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.
    Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Papaioannou W; Van Eldere J; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 8666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis.
    Bollen CM; Papaioanno W; Van Eldere J; Schepers E; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 9151584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series.
    Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
    Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a single-tooth implant.
    Johnson RH; Persson GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 10874805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
    Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function.
    Sailer I; Zembic A; Jung RE; Siegenthaler D; Holderegger C; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19397632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.