135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9109265)
1. Treatment of dehiscences and fenestrations around dental implants using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study.
Simion M; Misitano U; Gionso L; Salvato A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9109265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.
Simion M; Scarano A; Gionso L; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 8990634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year evaluation of implants placed at extraction and with dehiscences and fenestration defects augmented with ePTFE membranes: results from a prospective multicenter study.
Becker W; Dahlin C; Lekholm U; Bergstrom C; van Steenberghe D; Higuchi K; Becker BE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 1999; 1(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11359308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model.
Jones AA; Buser D; Schenk R; Wozney J; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1184-93. PubMed ID: 16805681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bioresorbable barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration around dental implants].
Kohal RJ; Hürzeler MB
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2002; 112(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 12585214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autogenous bone graft combined with polylactic polyglycolic acid polymer for treatment of dehiscence around immediate dental implants.
Hassan KS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e19-25. PubMed ID: 19836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Guided bone regeneration around dental implants using a bioabsorbable membrane. A pilot investigation in experimental animals].
Kohal RJ; Wirsching C; Bächle M
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(12):1397-405. PubMed ID: 11868387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration.
Zitzmann NU; Naef R; Schärer P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):844-52. PubMed ID: 9425767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the monkey.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Schüpbach P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Aug; 8(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 9586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study.
Fontana F; Santoro F; Maiorana C; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Simion M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1003-12. PubMed ID: 19216268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone augmentation at implant dehiscences and fenestrations. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Merli M; Merli I; Raffaelli E; Pagliaro U; Nastri L; Nieri M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 27022634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological and clinical comparisons of guided tissue regeneration on dehisced hydroxylapatite-coated and titanium endosseous implant surfaces: a pilot study.
Zablotsky M; Meffert R; Caudill R; Evans G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 1667524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study.
Jovanovic SA; Spiekermann H; Richter EJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 1398841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic analysis of regenerated bone around endosseous implants in the canine using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Jones AA; Makins SR; Turek TJ; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 9425754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study.
Moses O; Pitaru S; Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 15777331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
