135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9109265)
21. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts 3 years after loading: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Merli M; Lombardini F; Esposito M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 20657877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts.
Lorenzoni M; Pertl C; Keil C; Wegscheider WA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A one-stage approach for nonsubmerged implants using a xenograft in narrow ridges: report on seven cases.
De Boever AL; De Boever JA
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Apr; 23(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 12710820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Histologic and clinical observations of resorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes used in maxillary sinus graft containment.
Avera SP; Stampley WA; McAllister BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 9048460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Healing of implant dehiscence defects with and without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: a controlled clinical and histological study.
Palmer RM; Floyd PD; Palmer PJ; Smith BJ; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 7918915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration.
Barber HD; Lignelli J; Smith BM; Bartee BK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17368373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of lyodura for bone augmentation of osseous defects around dental implants.
Peleg M; Chaushu G; Blinder D; Taicher S
J Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 70(8):853-60. PubMed ID: 10476892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants.
Regev E; Smith RA; Perrott DH; Pogrel MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):451-61. PubMed ID: 7672848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lateral ridge augmentation and implant placement: an experimental study evaluating implant osseointegration in different augmentation materials in the canine mandible.
von Arx T; Cochran DL; Hermann JS; Schenk RK; Higginbottom FL; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 11432654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant treatment planning and rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla: Part 1.
John V; Gossweiler M
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2001; 80(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 11693002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of autogenous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences.
Veis AA; Tsirlis AT; Parisis NA
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15119886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Platelet-rich plasma may not provide any additional effect when associated with guided bone regeneration around dental implants in dogs.
de Vasconcelos Gurgel BC; Gonçalves PF; Pimentel SP; Ambrosano GM; Nociti Júnior FH; Sallum EA; Casati MZ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 17877464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Guided bone regeneration using demineralized laminar bone sheets versus GTAM membranes in the treatment of implant-associated defects. A clinical and histological study.
Majzoub Z; Cordioli G; Aramouni PK; Vigolo P; Piattelli A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1999 Oct; 10(5):406-14. PubMed ID: 10551065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
