These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9109270)

  • 1. Craniofacial osseointegrated implant-induced strain distribution: a numerical study.
    del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 9109270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Console abutment loading in craniofacial osseointegration.
    Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; del Valle V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 9581411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Researches on biomechanics of micro-implant-bone interface and optimum design of micro implant's neck].
    Deng F; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Song JL; Fan Y
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jul; 38(4):701-4. PubMed ID: 17718446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.
    Simmons CA; Meguid SA; Pilliar RM
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11347689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misfit and functional loading of craniofacial implants.
    Miller KL; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 15237870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.
    Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
    Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical evaluation of craniofacial osseointegration retention systems.
    Del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; Rangert B; Tan HK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7672853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
    Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.