These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9109274)

  • 1. Effects of attachment clips on occlusal force transmission in removable implant-supported overdentures and cantilevered superstructures.
    Kayacan R; Ballarini R; Mullen RL; Wang RR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 9109274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force transmission in bar-retained implant-stabilised mandibular over-dentures: an in-vitro study.
    el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 12526275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength comparison of four techniques to secure implant attachment housings to complete dentures.
    Domingo KB; Burgess JO; Litaker MS; McCracken MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jul; 110(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23849608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro changes in clips and bars used to retain implant overdentures.
    Walton JN; Ruse ND
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8809253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Special technique for attachment incorporation with an implant overdenture.
    Sadig WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 12589297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fabrication of custom clips for bar-and-clip attachments for implant-supported overdentures.
    Bolouri A; Zartman RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 17098504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.