1223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9111087)
41. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.
Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions.
Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Sep; 120(9):804-9. PubMed ID: 9140284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Tissue compression is not necessary for needle-localized lesion identification.
Méndez JE; ter Meulen D; Padussis J; Richard-Kowalski D; Raagas M; Pollack S; O'Connor D; Stone MD
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):580-2. PubMed ID: 16164925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Physician goals and laboratory test turnaround times. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2763 clinicians and 722 institutions.
Howanitz PJ; Cembrowski GS; Steindel SJ; Long TA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jan; 117(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 8418756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic.
López AM; Graham AR; Barker GP; Richter LC; Krupinski EA; Lian F; Grasso LL; Miller A; Kreykes LN; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1082-91. PubMed ID: 19552938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Rescreening in gynecologic cytology. Rescreening of 3762 previous cases for current high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinoma--a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 312 institutions.
Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Dec; 119(12):1097-103. PubMed ID: 7503656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions.
Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S; Ruby SG; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 134(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 20586623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Surgical pathology report defects: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 73 institutions.
Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Hunt JL; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 May; 138(5):602-12. PubMed ID: 24786118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports.
Leslie KO; Rosai J
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Nov; 11(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 7878300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantification of errors in laboratory reports. A quality improvement study of the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes program.
Howanitz PJ; Walker K; Bachner P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 1497440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Breast cancer pathology practices among Medicare patients undergoing unilateral extended simple mastectomy.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Wallen M; Llewellyn CC; Pryor V
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2002; 11(6):537-47. PubMed ID: 12225627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bedside glucose monitoring. Comparison of performance as studied by the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program.
Howanitz PJ; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8619743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bedside glucose monitoring quality control practices. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of program quality control documentation, program characteristics, and accuracy performance in 544 institutions.
Jones BA; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 8619744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Core components of a comprehensive quality assurance program in anatomic pathology.
Nakhleh RE
Adv Anat Pathol; 2009 Nov; 16(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19851132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories.
Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L; Jones MA; Ye J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20670135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Pathologic diagnostic correlation with breast imaging findings: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 48 institutions.
Idowu MO; Hardy LB; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 22208488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Proposed classification of clinical laboratory methods.
Skendzel LP; Batsakis JG; Lawson NS; Werner M; Manseau JE; Moore TD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):584-6. PubMed ID: 707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.
Layfield LJ; Anderson GM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Sep; 134(3):466-70. PubMed ID: 20716804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Recommendations for the reporting of breast carcinoma. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jan; 9(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 8821962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
