159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9111108)
1. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the view of a hospital administrator at Newport Hospital, Newport, Rhode Island.
Sampson AJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9111108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Sirota RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the expert witness database.
Wood WS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 9111130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: a defense lawyer's perspective.
Varner CD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 9111126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. College of American Pathologists Conference XXX on quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: introduction.
Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 9111105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The gynecologist's perspective of liability and quality issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Greer BE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 9111109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the role of professional organizations in reform initiatives.
Stanley MW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 9111127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: general legal background.
Kline TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 9111110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A look at Pap test accuracy and the duty to inform from a risk management perspective.
Meister S
QRC Advis; 1997 Dec; 14(2):1, 5-8. PubMed ID: 10176015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: an insurance industry perspective.
Scott MD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 9111107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
Koss LG
Physician Assist; 1994 Dec; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.
Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 9111115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Putting the Papanicolaou smear in perspective.
Zastrow RC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 9111104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blinded review of Papanicolaou smears.
Gill GW
Cancer; 2005 Apr; 105(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 15662699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HPV: from the cervical smear to the research bench to the court room.
Atkins K
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 14692078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Follow-up systems can reduce malpractice risk.
Isadore M
Alaska Med; 1991; 33(4):170, 179. PubMed ID: 1816735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Errors in cervical smears: minimizing the risk of medicolegal consequences.
Greening SE
Monogr Pathol; 1997; (39):16-39. PubMed ID: 9249818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malpractice protection: communication of diagnostic uncertainty.
Skoumal SM; Florell SR; Bydalek MK; Hunter WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 8725143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
