216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9111109)
21. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
DeMay RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities.
Mintzer M; Curtis P; Resnick JC; Morrell D
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 10385441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Why women still die from cervical cancer.
Masood S
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 9379163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reducing the error rate in Papanicolaou smears. One laboratory's experience with the PAPNET system.
Koss LG
Physician Assist; 1994 Dec; 18(12):48-52. PubMed ID: 10139375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the expert witness database.
Wood WS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 9111130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
Sepúlveda C; Prado R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical cancer screening among elderly urban women in a primary care setting.
Wong QC; Collins R; Kalkstein K; Roth A; Gintautas J
Proc West Pharmacol Soc; 2005; 48():154-6. PubMed ID: 16416686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Organisation of cervical cytology screening in Croatia: past, present and future.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Kardum-Skelin I; Mahovlić V; Mozetic-Vrdoljak D; Ovanin-Rakić A
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():47-54. PubMed ID: 17598505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
Marsan C
Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
Wai D; Ferrier A; Collings S; Laverty C
Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current cervical cancer screening practices of Dane County, Wisconsin primary care clinicians.
Marchand L; Van Dinter M; Mundt M; Dingel W; Klein G
WMJ; 2003; 102(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 12822288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pap smear screening among urban Southwestern American Indian women.
Risendal B; DeZapien J; Fowler B; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):510-8. PubMed ID: 10600432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [On the occasion of the 65th birthday of the cervical smear: added value of population studies for cervical cancer remains unclear].
Giard RW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1268-71. PubMed ID: 17624154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Strategies for reducing Papanicolaou smear screening errors: principles derived from data and experience with quality control.
Krieger PA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 9111118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
