147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9111118)
1. Strategies for reducing Papanicolaou smear screening errors: principles derived from data and experience with quality control.
Krieger PA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 9111118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: lessons from the science of error prevention.
Derman H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9111120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The challenge of quality improvement with the Papanicolaou smear.
Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 9111111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
Marsan C
Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance in cytopathology. Recommendations and ongoing quality assurance activities of the American Society of Clinical Pathologists.
Bonfiglio TA
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 2750429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.
Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 9111115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Education and training for cytopathologists. Its role in quality assurance.
Parker JE
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):448-50. PubMed ID: 2750433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. College of American Pathologists Conference XXX on quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: introduction.
Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 9111105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: general legal background.
Kline TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 9111110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The gynecologist's perspective of liability and quality issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Greer BE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 9111109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: a defense lawyer's perspective.
Varner CD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 9111126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a zero error standard exist for the Papanicolaou smear? A pathologist's perspective.
Frable WJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 9111124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the role of professional organizations in reform initiatives.
Stanley MW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 9111127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automation of the Papanicolaou smear: a technology assessment perspective.
Linder J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9111119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A continuous quality improvement project to improve the quality of cervical Papanicolaou smears.
Burkman RT; Ward R; Balchandani K; Kini S
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 8058251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting the Papanicolaou smear in perspective.
Zastrow RC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 9111104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving Papanicolaou test quality and reducing medical errors by using Toyota production system methods.
Raab SS; Andrew-Jaja C; Condel JL; Dabbs DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 16389010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal quality assurance of sensitivity of primary screening.
Boxer ME
Cytopathology; 1998 Oct; 9(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 9800134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
