These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9111624)
1. Correlation between prostate size estimated by digital rectal examination and measured by transrectal ultrasound. Roehrborn CG; Girman CJ; Rhodes T; Hanson KA; Collins GN; Sech SM; Jacobsen SJ; Garraway WM; Lieber MM Urology; 1997 Apr; 49(4):548-57. PubMed ID: 9111624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interexaminer reliability and validity of a three-dimensional model to assess prostate volume by digital rectal examination. Roehrborn CG; Sech S; Montoya J; Rhodes T; Girman CJ Urology; 2001 Jun; 57(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 11377314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate determination of prostate size via digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound. Roehrborn CG Urology; 1998 Apr; 51(4A Suppl):19-22. PubMed ID: 9586592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver variation of prostatic volume estimation with digital rectal examination by urological staffs with different experiences. Cheng WC; Ng FC; Chan KC; Cheung YH; Chan WL; Wong SW Int Braz J Urol; 2004; 30(6):466-71. PubMed ID: 15663803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of clinically significant prostate volumes by digital rectal examination: a comparative prospective study. Ahmad S; Manecksha RP; Cullen IM; Flynn RJ; McDermott TE; Grainger R; Thornhill JA Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6025-30. PubMed ID: 22166330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the estimation of prostate volume in community-based men aged 50 to 78 years: the Krimpen Study. Bosch JL; Bohnen AM; Groeneveld FP Eur Urol; 2004 Dec; 46(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 15548443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a prostate model to assist in training for digital rectal examination. Yanoshak SJ; Roehrborn CG; Girman CJ; Jaffe JS; Ginsberg PC; Harkaway RC Urology; 2000 May; 55(5):690-3. PubMed ID: 10792082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography. Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate size, nocturia and the digital rectal examination: a cohort study of 30 500 men. Stone BV; Shoag J; Halpern JA; Mittal S; Lewicki P; Golombos DM; Bedretdinova D; Chughtai B; Barbieri CE; Lee RK BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 27480499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Mettlin C; Lee F; Drago J; Murphy GP Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(12):2949-58. PubMed ID: 1710531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer. Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical utility of transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Shapiro A; Lebensart PD; Pode D; Bloom RA Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):668-71. PubMed ID: 8062008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer]. Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best. Babaian RJ; Dinney CP; Ramirez EI; Evans RB Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 7683834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of three calliper-based transrectal ultrasound methods and digital rectal examination in the estimation of prostate volume and its changes with age: the Krimpen study. Bosch JL; Bohnen AM; Groeneveld FP; Bernsen R Prostate; 2005 Mar; 62(4):353-63. PubMed ID: 15389783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Chiu PK; Roobol MJ; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yip SY; Hou SM; Bangma CH; Ng CF Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1631-7. PubMed ID: 27349564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: a meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic korean men. Song JM; Kim CB; Chung HC; Kane RL Yonsei Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 15988815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators. Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]