These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9112803)

  • 1. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.
    Carroll M; Nelson TO; Kirwan A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Apr; 95(3):239-53. PubMed ID: 9112803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of overlearning on the feeling of knowing is more detectable in within-subject than in between-subject designs.
    Carroll M; Nelson TO
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 8338189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
    Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?
    Leonesio RJ; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 2140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do distractors interfere with memory for study pairs in associative recognition?
    Perruchet P; Rey A; Hivert E; Pacton S
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17128603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults.
    Souchay C; Isingrini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 22342997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.