These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114078)

  • 1. Low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s: prices change.
    Palmisano SM
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):309; discussion 312-4. PubMed ID: 9114078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s.
    Radensky PW; Cahill NE
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):310-1; discussion 312-5. PubMed ID: 9114079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In contrast with 1990s, media prices set to rise.
    DeJohn P
    Hosp Mater Manage; 2005 May; 30(5):1, 9-10. PubMed ID: 16011020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective use of radiographic low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s.
    Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Sonnad SS; Cohan NS
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 8685315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective use of low osmolality contrast agents: cost and benefits.
    Ohnesorgen EG; Yoshino MT
    Radiol Technol; 1988; 59(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 3136507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Paulin S
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(3):202-3; author reply 204-5. PubMed ID: 1608418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Calvo MV; Pilar del Val M; Mar Alvarez M; Domínguez-Gil A
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-osmolality contrast agents--who needs them?
    Hirshfeld JW
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):482-4. PubMed ID: 1732775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Parfrey PS; Barrett BJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(3):204-5. PubMed ID: 1608421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast media costs can be reduced still more.
    Campbell JW
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 May; 22(5):12. PubMed ID: 10167086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast media markdown.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Dec; 18(12):49-51, 54, 59. PubMed ID: 10163650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment.
    Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liquid gold: low-osmolality contrast media.
    White RI; Halden WJ
    Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):559-60. PubMed ID: 3515427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Materials managers clip contrast media costs.
    Barlow RD
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1992 Jun; 17(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10119199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adoption of low-osmolar contrast agents in the United States: historical analysis of health policy and clinical practice.
    Wilmot A; Mehta N; Jha S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1049-53. PubMed ID: 23096178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium.
    Fischer HW; Spataro RF; Rosenberg PM
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Sep; 146(9):1717-21. PubMed ID: 3092757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conversion to nonionics packs economic punch.
    Brumbaugh J; Young SW; Cohen D
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Jul; 13(7):99-104. PubMed ID: 10149725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.