92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114099)
1. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Dachman AH; Lieberman J; Osnis RB; Chen SY; Hoffmann KR; Chen CT; Newmark GM; McGill J
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 9114099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI; Morgan PR; Talbot IC; Fry N; Saunders BP; Khosraviani K; Atkin W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 14519872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ehman RL; Ilstrup DM
Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8657944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy).
Rex DK; Vining D; Kopecky KK
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10462648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography].
Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering.
McFarland EG; Brink JA; Loh J; Wang G; Argiro V; Balfe DM; Heiken JP; Vannier MW
Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 9393524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition.
Beaulieu CF; Napel S; Daniel BL; Ch'en IY; Rubin GD; Johnstone IM; Jeffrey RB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):656-63. PubMed ID: 9676463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography.
Power NP; Pryor MD; Martin A; Horrocks J; McLean AM; Reznek RH
Br J Radiol; 2002 May; 75(893):401-8. PubMed ID: 12036832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement--in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen.
Slater A; Taylor SA; Burling D; Gartner L; Scarth J; Halligan S
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 16793973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study.
Mang TG; Schaefer-Prokop C; Maier A; Schober E; Lechner G; Prokop M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 16304017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.
McFarland EG; Brink JA; Pilgram TK; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Hirselj DA; Weinstock L; Littenberg B
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11161149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation.
Whiting BR; McFarland EG; Brink JA
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11012440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of scanning parameters for multi-slice CT colonography: experiments with synthetic and animal phantoms.
Embleton KV; Nicholson DA; Hufton AP; Jackson A
Clin Radiol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):955-63. PubMed ID: 14654028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms.
Won HJ; Choi BI; Kim SH; Kim YI; Youn BJ; Han JK
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15597017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ahlquist DA; Nelson H; Ehman RL; McCollough CH; Ilstrup DM
Gastroenterology; 1996 Jan; 110(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 8536869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal lesions: evaluation with CT colography.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE
Radiographics; 1997; 17(5):1157-67; discussion 1167-8. PubMed ID: 9308108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection of polyps in a colon phantom: effect of scan orientation, polyp size, collimation, and dose.
Ling SH; Summers RM; Loew MH; McCollough CH; Johnson CD
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2002; 26(6):1013-8. PubMed ID: 12488752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom.
Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
