These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI; Morgan PR; Talbot IC; Fry N; Saunders BP; Khosraviani K; Atkin W Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 14519872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ehman RL; Ilstrup DM Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8657944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Rex DK; Vining D; Kopecky KK Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10462648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography]. Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. McFarland EG; Brink JA; Loh J; Wang G; Argiro V; Balfe DM; Heiken JP; Vannier MW Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 9393524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study. Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. Beaulieu CF; Napel S; Daniel BL; Ch'en IY; Rubin GD; Johnstone IM; Jeffrey RB J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):656-63. PubMed ID: 9676463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography. Power NP; Pryor MD; Martin A; Horrocks J; McLean AM; Reznek RH Br J Radiol; 2002 May; 75(893):401-8. PubMed ID: 12036832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement--in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen. Slater A; Taylor SA; Burling D; Gartner L; Scarth J; Halligan S Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 16793973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study. Mang TG; Schaefer-Prokop C; Maier A; Schober E; Lechner G; Prokop M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 16304017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques. McFarland EG; Brink JA; Pilgram TK; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Hirselj DA; Weinstock L; Littenberg B Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11161149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation. Whiting BR; McFarland EG; Brink JA Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11012440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of scanning parameters for multi-slice CT colonography: experiments with synthetic and animal phantoms. Embleton KV; Nicholson DA; Hufton AP; Jackson A Clin Radiol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):955-63. PubMed ID: 14654028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms. Won HJ; Choi BI; Kim SH; Kim YI; Youn BJ; Han JK Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15597017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE; Ahlquist DA; Nelson H; Ehman RL; McCollough CH; Ilstrup DM Gastroenterology; 1996 Jan; 110(1):284-90. PubMed ID: 8536869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal lesions: evaluation with CT colography. Hara AK; Johnson CD; Reed JE Radiographics; 1997; 17(5):1157-67; discussion 1167-8. PubMed ID: 9308108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection of polyps in a colon phantom: effect of scan orientation, polyp size, collimation, and dose. Ling SH; Summers RM; Loew MH; McCollough CH; Johnson CD J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2002; 26(6):1013-8. PubMed ID: 12488752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom. Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]