These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC. Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee. Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging. Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Preliminary trial of three-dimensional water-excitation magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging of articular cartilage]. Yoshioka H; Lang P; Ikeda K; Niitsu M; Itai Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Sep; 61(10):545-7. PubMed ID: 11676173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patellar articular cartilage lesions: in vitro MR imaging evaluation after placement in gadopentetate dimeglumine solution. Woertler K; Buerger H; Moeller J; Rummeny EJ Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):768-73. PubMed ID: 14739308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Recht MP; Kramer J; Marcelis S; Pathria MN; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Sartoris DJ; Resnick D Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8475293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol. Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard. Ahn JM; Kwak SM; Kang HS; Muhle C; Pedowitz RA; Frank LR; Trudell D; Haghighi P; Resnick D Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 9646793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T. Yao L; Sinha S; Seeger LL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 1370362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of articular cartilage: three-dimensional T1 mapping with variable flip angles and B1 correction. Andreisek G; White LM; Yang Y; Robinson E; Cheng HL; Sussman MS Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 19703855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging. Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T. Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]