These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114122)

  • 1. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images.
    Byng JW; Critten JP; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):564-8. PubMed ID: 9114122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays.
    Samei E
    Radiographics; 2005; 25(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 15798066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography.
    Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):410-20. PubMed ID: 10844867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for practical equalization mammography of the radiographically dense breast.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Radiographics; 1995 Sep; 15(5):1191-202. PubMed ID: 7501859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer-assisted visualization of digital mammography images].
    Funke M; Netsch T; Breiter N; Biehl M; Peitgen HO; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 Nov; 171(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 10619037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digitizing and consolidating mammograms and other images for teaching applications.
    Bassignani MJ; LoRusso AP; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 16679282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
    Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
    Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.