409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114234)
41. Sinusoidal amplitude modulation alters contralateral noise suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
Neuroscience; 1999; 91(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 10336065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Hyperactive auditory efferent system and lack of acoustic reflexes in Williams syndrome.
Attias J; Raveh E; Ben-Naftali NF; Zarchi O; Gothelf D
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2008; 19(3-4):193-207. PubMed ID: 19025031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Zhao W; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
Bulut E; Öztürk L
Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Development of human cochlear active mechanism asymmetry: involvement of the medial olivocochlear system?
Morlet T; Goforth L; Hood LJ; Ferber C; Duclaux R; Berlin CI
Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 134(1-2):153-62. PubMed ID: 10452385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in children. pure tone 1.0 kHz and 2.0 kHz suppressive effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Kossowska I; Lisowska G; Urbaniec P
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):112-5. PubMed ID: 11318438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.
Lichtenhan JT; Wilson US; Hancock KE; Guinan JJ
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():216-224. PubMed ID: 26364824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?
Giraud AL; Wable J; Chays A; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2219-27. PubMed ID: 9348679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Effect of Contralateral Pure Tones on the Compound Action Potential in Humans: Efferent Tuning Curves.
Najem F; Ferraro J; Chertoff M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 26905530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
Stuart A; Butler AK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans.
Micheyl C; Perrot X; Collet L
Behav Neurosci; 1997 Aug; 111(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 9267657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Human medial efferent activity elicited by dynamic versus static contralateral noises.
Mertes IB
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():100-109. PubMed ID: 29793763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The First Jerger Lecture. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivocochlear system.
Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley A; Wen H
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Jan; 110(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 8290299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of 100Hz amplitude modulation on the human medial olivocochlear reflex.
Boothalingam S; Purcell D; Scollie S
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 580():56-61. PubMed ID: 25102324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
