These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114395)
1. Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Personne P; Bes M; Lina G; Vandenesch F; Brun Y; Etienne J J Clin Microbiol; 1997 May; 35(5):1138-40. PubMed ID: 9114395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International multicenter evaluation of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. van Griethuysen A; Bes M; Etienne J; Zbinden R; Kluytmans J J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 11136753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New latex reagent using monoclonal antibodies to capsular polysaccharide for reliable identification of both oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Fournier JM; Bouvet A; Mathieu D; Nato F; Boutonnier A; Gerbal R; Brunengo P; Saulnier C; Sagot N; Slizewicz B J Clin Microbiol; 1993 May; 31(5):1342-4. PubMed ID: 8501240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of six agglutination tests for Staphylococcus aureus identification depending upon local prevalence of meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Weist K; Cimbal AK; Lecke C; Kampf G; Rüden H; Vonberg RP J Med Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 55(Pt 3):283-290. PubMed ID: 16476792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Andriesse GI; Elberts S; Vrolijk A; Verhulst C; Kluytmans JA Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 20941519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of new agglutination test for identification of oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Tveten Y J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1333-4. PubMed ID: 7615750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to oxacillin. Punsalang A; Migneault PC; Nolte FS J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Dec; 24(6):1104-6. PubMed ID: 3640773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of six rapid agglutination tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains. Gupta H; McKinnon N; Louie L; Louie M; Simor AE Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 9635906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of five agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Wilkerson M; McAllister S; Miller JM; Heiter BJ; Bourbeau PP J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 8968897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new Staphylococcus aureus latex agglutination kit, Prolex Staph Xtra, against other third-generation kits. Davies S; McIntyre SM; McKinven A Br J Biomed Sci; 2008; 65(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 18986102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the evaluation of rapid agglutination methods. Davies S Br J Biomed Sci; 1997 Mar; 54(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 9167304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of six commercial identification kits for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Zschöck M; Nesseler A; Sudarwanto I J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(2):450-5. PubMed ID: 15659199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved identification of Staphylococcus aureus using a new agglutination test. Results of an international study. Croize J; Gialanella P; Monnet D; Okada J; Orsi A; Voss A; Merlin S APMIS; 1993 Jun; 101(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 8363825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of rapid coagulase methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Berke A; Tilton RC J Clin Microbiol; 1986 May; 23(5):916-9. PubMed ID: 3635533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of four commercial rapid diagnostic kits for identifying Staphylococcus aureus. Wu JJ; Chang TC; Chen HM Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Aug; 28(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 9775000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-negative test results in the Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux) agglutination test are mainly caused by spa-type t001 and t001-related strains. Szabados F; Woloszyn J; Kaase M; Gatermann SG Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Feb; 30(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 20936317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Janda WM; Ristow K; Novak D J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2056-9. PubMed ID: 7814525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Critical analysis of tests for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Pastorex Staph plus, Slidex Staph-kit and Staph aureus in clinical isolates]. Felten A; Lepage E; Lagrange P Pathol Biol (Paris); 1995 May; 43(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 8532384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples. Luijendijk A; van Belkum A; Verbrugh H; Kluytmans J J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Sep; 34(9):2267-9. PubMed ID: 8862596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Latex agglutination and hemagglutination tests for the rapid identification of methicillin sensitive and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Qadri SM; Akhter J; Qadri SG J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1991; 35(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 1880410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]