These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9114423)

  • 1. Assessment of swab transport systems for aerobic and anaerobic organism recovery.
    Perry JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 May; 35(5):1269-71. PubMed ID: 9114423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three transport systems (Starplex StarSwab II, the new Copan Vi-Pak Amies Agar Gel collection and transport swabs, and BBL Port-A-Cul) for maintenance of anaerobic and fastidious aerobic organisms.
    Hindiyeh M; Acevedo V; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):377-80. PubMed ID: 11136806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in purulent clinical specimens maintained in the Copan Venturi Transystem and Becton Dickinson Port-a-Cul transport systems.
    Citron DM; Warren YA; Hudspeth MK; Goldstein EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):892-4. PubMed ID: 10655410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability.
    Van Horn KG; Audette CD; Sebeck D; Tucker KA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1655-8. PubMed ID: 18353935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
    Van Horn KG; Audette CD; Tucker KA; Sebeck D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Dec; 62(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 18814991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses.
    Brook I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Oct; 25(10):2020-2. PubMed ID: 3667926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the effects of storage in two different swab fabrics and under three different transport conditions on recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
    Roelofsen E; van Leeuwen M; Meijer-Severs GJ; Wilkinson MH; Degener JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 37(9):3041-3. PubMed ID: 10449502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative survival of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in Port-A-Cul and Copan transport systems.
    Stoner KA; Rabe LK; Austin MN; Meyn LA; Hillier SL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2739-44. PubMed ID: 18579722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of four commercial transport media for the survival of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    Arbique JC; Forward KR; LeBlanc J
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Mar; 36(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 10729658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of direct inoculation and Copan transport systems for isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from endocervical specimens.
    Olsen CC; Schwebke JR; Benjamin WH; Beverly A; Waites KB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Nov; 37(11):3583-5. PubMed ID: 10523556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Port-A-Cul transport system for protection of anaerobic bacteria.
    Mena E; Thompson FS; Armfield AY; Dowell VR; Reinhardt DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jul; 8(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 353071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Easy-Flow Copan Liquid Stuart's and Starplex Swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria.
    Drake C; Barenfanger J; Lawhorn J; Verhulst S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 43(3):1301-3. PubMed ID: 15750099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of bacterial recovery and viability from three different swab transport systems.
    Tan TY; Ng LS; Sim DM; Cheng Y; Min MO
    Pathology; 2014 Apr; 46(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24614721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of a transport medium for the recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from applicator swabs.
    Barry AL; Fay GD; Sauer RL
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Jul; 24(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 4626907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
    Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Accu-CulShure system and a swab placed in a B-D Port-a-Cul tube for specimen collection and transport.
    Baron EJ; Väisänen ML; McTeague M; Strong CA; Norman D; Finegold SM
    Clin Infect Dis; 1993 Jun; 16 Suppl 4():S325-7. PubMed ID: 8324141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of infected diabetic feet.
    Sapico FL; Canawati HN; Witte JL; Montgomerie JZ; Wagner FW; Bessman AN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Sep; 12(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 7217335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery of anaerobic, facultative, and aerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in three anaerobic transport systems.
    Helstad AG; Kimball JL; Maki DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Jun; 5(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 328525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The bacteriology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Chow AW; Malkasian KL; Marshall JR; Guze LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 122(7):876-9. PubMed ID: 807109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A transport method for swab specimens submitted for aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology.
    Alfa M; Lee A
    J Clin Pathol; 1982 May; 35(5):555-60. PubMed ID: 7085900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.